themify
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/goodspeedhist/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114This year residents of Delaware Township in Hunterdon County celebrate the 175 years since the township was created. Five years ago, in celebration of its 170th anniversary, I published a series of articles on the website \u201a\u00c4\u00faThe Delaware Township Post.\u201a\u00c4\u00f9 It seems appropriate to republish those articles this year on my own website, slightly edited. Here is part two:<\/i><\/p>\n
As described in a previous post<\/a>,\u00ac\u2020the creation of Delaware Township, as well as Raritan and Amwell (East & West) Townships was the consequence of political maneuvering in Trenton by the current political parties, the Whigs and the Democrats.<\/p>\n Who were the Whigs and who were the Democrats? The Democratic Party came into being during the campaign of 1828 between John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson. Both men had belonged to the old Republican party begun by Thomas Jefferson, but divisions had emerged over the years, which were embodied by the presidential candidates. Adams men called themselves National Republicans and Jackson men called themselves Democratic Republicans, which became shortened to Democrats by the 1830s. By the time Jackson won his second term in 1832, Adams\u201a\u00c4\u00f4 National Republicans had faded away, but opposition to Jackson\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s policies was still strong, led by Henry Clay and Daniel Webster. In 1834, when Jackson was proposing radical economic policies, the opposition compared him to King George, and described themselves as defenders of liberty. They took the name “Whig” from the English party opposed to the Tories in 18th century England.<\/p>\n \u201a\u00c4\u00faNew Jersey\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s Civil Boundaries,\u201a\u00c4\u00f9 written by John P. Snyder, is the definitive work on New Jersey municipalities. It is an excellent book, but Mr. Snyder was in error when he wrote that Delaware was created by referendum on April 2, 1838. Surprised by that statement, I went to the State Archives to see if I could find evidence of a referendum. There was none, as the letter-writers to the Gazette make abundantly clear. The legislation simply states that the division would take effect \u201a\u00c4\u00faon and after the first Monday of April next\u201a\u00c4\u00f9 which was April 2, 1838.<\/p>\n The call for virtuous indignation by the Citizens of Amwell was answered by a \u201a\u00c4\u00falarge and respectable gathering\u201a\u00c4\u00f9 that took place on March 15th at the tavern of William Yard in Ringoes. The Gazette published the report of the meeting and the resolutions that were voted on. John Barber of Delaware Township was chosen to be chairman of the meeting. He had been chosen as Moderator for Amwell Township\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s last town meeting in 1837.<\/p>\n The secretary was Henry S. Hunt Esq., who was defeated in the election to the Governor\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s Council1<\/a><\/sup> by Joseph Moore in October 1837. Joseph Moore was the member of Council who introduced the bill to divide Amwell Township. Hunt had run as an anti-Caucus Democrat, and got a majority of votes in Moore\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s home of Hopewell Twp. Moore, running as the regular Democrat, won in Amwell, which was Hunt\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s home.<\/p>\n After officers were chosen, a committee was selected to compose \u201a\u00c4\u00faresolutions expressive of the sentiments of the meeting.\u201a\u00c4\u00f9 James J. Fisher of Delaware Twp. was a member, along with Elijah Wilson Esq. who lived in Raritan Twp.2<\/a><\/sup> The resolutions stated in part:<\/p>\n \u201a\u00c4\u00fawhen, without any note of warning, without even an intimation to the people– and with apparently a studied desire to avoid being known to the people– a few designing individuals, under pretense of representing our wishes and of obeying our call, have taken all power and all prerogative into their hands and induced a too confiding legislature to pass such enactments in opposition to our wishes and without our consent:\u00ac\u2020 Therefore,<\/p>\n \u201a\u00c4\u00fa1st.\u00ac\u2020 Resolved, That by submitting quietly to such acts of usurpation, our rights as freemen are taken away–that they are a vital thrust at the sovereignty of the people–and are calculated to sap the foundation of the laws of the state, and to undermine the basis upon which our liberties rest.<\/p>\n \u201a\u00c4\u00fa2nd.\u00ac\u2020 Resolved.\u00ac\u2020 That we seriously regret the manner in which our township has been divided by a recent law of the state, and think we can recognize a train of personal interests that have been engaged to deceive the legislature, in persons pledging themselves that the inhabitants of the township were in favor of a division when in fact we believe that not one in 100 of them knew that such a bill was before the House.<\/p>\n \u201a\u00c4\u00fa3d.\u00ac\u2020 Resolved.\u00ac\u2020 That by thus treating us as slaves and bondsmen, and by thus invading and abasing the inalienable right of every American patriot, we feel that the advocates of this political fraud, and the principle of the fraud itself, should receive the censure and disapprobation of every independent freedom-loving inhabitant of old Amwell.\u201a\u00c4\u00f9<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Fisher and Wilson, along with the other members of the committee, were all Whigs. The Whigs of Amwell were more upset about the division than the Democrats were. The division of Amwell was done to benefit Democrats rather than Whigs, who were only interested in the new county of Mercer. According to the editor of the New Jersey State Gazette, \u201a\u00c4\u00fathe originators of this measure\u201a\u00c4\u00f9 belonged \u201a\u00c4\u00fato the Flemington coterie of caucus wire workers.\u201a\u00c4\u00f9 He was referring to the Flemington Caucus, the local organization of Democrats.<\/p>\n The Flemington Caucus was notorious in New Jersey for the way party leaders manipulated the outcome of the caucus process behind the scenes. Their model was Martin Van Buren and his New York political machine. A \u201a\u00c4\u00fawire worker\u201a\u00c4\u00f9 was a politician who influenced events behind the scenes.3<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n