Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the themify domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/goodspeedhist/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/goodspeedhist/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/goodspeedhist/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/goodspeedhist/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/goodspeedhist/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/goodspeedhist/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/goodspeedhist/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/goodspeedhist/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/goodspeedhist/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/goodspeedhist/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/goodspeedhist/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/goodspeedhist/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/goodspeedhist/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/goodspeedhist/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/goodspeedhist/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/goodspeedhist/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/goodspeedhist/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893
{"id":8328,"date":"2014-06-20T15:18:46","date_gmt":"2014-06-20T19:18:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/goodspeedhistories.com\/?p=8328"},"modified":"2020-09-07T10:01:20","modified_gmt":"2020-09-07T14:01:20","slug":"the-amwell-road-of-1721","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodspeedhistories.com\/the-amwell-road-of-1721\/","title":{"rendered":"The Amwell Road of 1721"},"content":{"rendered":"

There is something fascinating about old roads, especially when their routes differ from the ones we know today. One of the very oldest roads in Hunterdon County was “layed out”\u00ac\u2020in December 1721 and recorded in January 1721\/22.<\/p>\n

Here is the full text, as transcribed in Snell\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s History of Hunterdon County (p. 347), which I will follow with my attempt to decipher what route was being described.1<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

\u00ac\u2020\u201a\u00c4\u00faA draught of the Amwell Road that leads from Malayehik into the Road that cums from Greens plantation to Cornelius Anderson.<\/p>\n

Mount Amwell, December ye 13th<\/sup>\u00ac\u2020 1721. Then layed out A Road fower Rods in Breadth According to An Act of Assembly Made And provided for that purpose<\/p>\n

Beginning in ye said townshyp by ye Readington paith that leads from MR. Readings old plantation to wher John reading now Lives Att two Black oaks trees marked by sd paith\u00ac\u2020 Thence along As Markt to A white oake tree Marked To the sutherd of Nathaniel petits plantation\u00ac\u2020 thence Along As Marked to A hickory tree Markt by nishianing kricke\u00ac\u2020 thence over sd krick As direct As may be to the school howse on the west seid of ye sd schoole howse\u00ac\u2020 thence Along straight As marked to A Black oake tree on the west side of the paith that Leads from James Stouts to Joseph Hicksons\u00ac\u2020 then along as marked Betweixt the palatins Land And John Warforts\u00ac\u2020 thence Along As Marked by the east side of the old Indian towne to A red oake tree Marked in or near the Line Betwixt Benjamin Hicksons Land and Ruckmans\u00ac\u2020 Thence Along ye sd line till it passeth the house of ye sd Ruckman\u00ac\u2020 then through the corner of ye sd Ruckman field to A white oake tree\u00ac\u2020 thence Along As marked to A Blacke oake tree Marked on ye east side of the old Road that Leads from George Greens old plantation to Cornelius Andersons plantation<\/p>\n

Layed out By us Commissioners the day and year Above written\u00ac\u2020 Philip Ringo, John Burroughs, Charles Clark, George Green, John Holcomb, Chas. I Burroughs, Commissioners.\u00ac\u2020 Entered the above Draught January 26th<\/sup>\u00ac\u2020 1721\/22. Alexander Lockhart, Recorder<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Note that George Green, whose plantation is near the route, is one of the Commissioners of Highways. Philip Ringo and John Holcomb are other well-known early settlers of Amwell Township.<\/p>\n

Following the unification of East and West New Jersey, the legislature passed a law establishing the position of Commissioner of Highways, to be appointed for each county. In 1716, the law was modified by eliminating that position and replacing it with Surveyors of Highways (though they were still called Commissioners in 1721), responsible for designing and laying out the roads, and then recording these designs in a county road book. An additional position was created called Overseers of Roads. These were the people whose job it was to build and maintain the roads. They were supposed to be named by two Justices of the Peace, and were responsible for calling out individuals to do the work.2<\/a><\/sup> This was the law that governed\u00ac\u2020creation of the Amwell Road of 1721.<\/p>\n

Let\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s follow this road, step by step:<\/p>\n

1)\u00ac\u2020 \u201a\u00c4\u00faA draught of the Amwell Road that leads from Malayehik into the Road that cums from Greens plantation to Cornelius Anderson.\u00ac\u2020<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Malayehik (sometimes spelled Malayelick) is the name of an old Indian path that ran from the villages on the Assunpinck (Trenton) to the Forks of the Delaware (Easton, PA). Today it is simply Route 579. The Amwell Road therefore\u00ac\u2020comes from Route 579 to a road that connects George Green\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s plantation with land belonging to Cornelius Anderson. What road is that? Green\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s plantation is southeast of Mt. Airy, as shown on Hammond Map G, but where was Cornelius Anderson?<\/p>\n

According to the Op Dyke Genealogy, Cornelius Anderson owned a mill in the southwest corner of Hopewell Township, which would put him close to the Delaware River near Ewing Township. Unfortunately, D. Stanton Hammond did not map the proprietary tracts in this area. Hopewell Valley Heritage <\/em>by Alice Blackwell Lewis suggests (p. 7) that Anderson\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s mill was located on Jacob\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s Creek, which is somewhat southwest of Titusville.<\/p>\n

Richard W. Hunter and Richard L. Porter also put the Anderson family near Titusville.3<\/a><\/sup> This wonderful book also includes a 1781 map by John Hills called \u201a\u00c4\u00faA Sketch of the Northern Parts of New Jersey.\u201a\u00c4\u00f9 It shows that to get from George Green\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s plantation near Mt. Airy to the Delaware River in Hopewell one must either travel southwest on today\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s Route 179 (the Old York Road) to meet with a road that runs along the river from Coryell\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s Ferry southeast to Trenton. Or–take the Mt. Airy-Harbourton Road, which is barely visible on this map.<\/p>\n

The Hills map also shows a road beginning at Howell\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s Ferry (lower left) going north toward Flemington (upper left) which is Route 523. It shows another road branching off from that road about half way to Flemington at “Buchanan’s” that leads east to Ringoes. This has to be Route 579, although it looks a little weird.\u00ac\u2020Another road appears to leave Howell\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s Ferry and make a large arch to come around to meet today\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s Route 179 close to Coryell\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s Ferry. This must be\u00ac\u2020the Route 523–Sandy Ridge-Mt. Airy–Route 179 path.<\/p>\n

\"Map<\/a>
Map by John Hills, 1781 (Library of Congress)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

I downloaded this map from the Library of Congress website. The labels are faint, so I added them in Photoshop, along with labels for the modern roads. The problem is that it is just about impossible to figure out where Harbourton is located, and that is very important. So, I am offering next the map of 1828 prepared by Thomas Gordon for the New Jersey legislature.<\/p>\n

\"Detail,<\/a>
Detail, 1828 Map of the State of New Jersey . . . by Thomas Gordon<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

As you can see, Howell\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s Ferry is now Prallsville, next to Centre Bridge. Coryell\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s Ferry is now Lambertville. \u201a\u00c4\u00faRittenhouse\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s\u201a\u00c4\u00f9 is today\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s Rosemont. Harbourton is now on the map, but it is called Herbertown (even though it\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s named after the Harbourts). Rocktown is there, and that is very helpful to this discussion. Mt. Airy is not identified, but it is visible along Rte 179. Once again, I have added labels with Photoshop for purposes of discussing this road.<\/p>\n

It is hard to make the 1781 map jibe with the 1828 map. Coming to conclusions from 18th<\/sup> century maps is tricky. Example: The detail of the Faden Map of 1778 shows Route 179 running north from \u201a\u00c4\u00faUpper Falls\u201a\u00c4\u00f9 (Lambertville) to Ringoes. Intersecting it part way is a road that runs southwest to Howell\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s Ferry. It fails to show any road connecting Howell\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s Ferry to Flemington, even though that road had been in existence for many years.<\/p>\n

It is easy to forget that the old roads were fairly provisional affairs, as we are so accustomed to our paved roads. A dirt road that was only used occasionally could quickly turn back into a path and then just disappear. This might explain why the routes changed fairly often, and why the old maps never seem to agree.<\/p>\n

2) Mount Amwell, December ye 13th<\/sup>\u00ac\u2020 1721. Then layed out A Road fower [four] Rods in Breadth According to An Act of Assembly Made And provided for that purpose\u00ac\u2020\u00ac\u2020<\/strong><\/p>\n

The road description was written at Mount Amwell, which was the home of John Reading Sr. from about 1705 until his death in 1717. Mount Amwell was located just north of Howell\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s Ferry (Stockton), was the home of John Reading Jr., later Governor of New Jersey, until he built his mansion house at Flemington Junction. It is important not to assume that the road began at Mount Amwell\u201a\u00c4\u00eeit did not.<\/p>\n

3) Beginning in ye said townshyp by ye Readington paith that leads from Mr. Readings old plantation to wher John reading now Lives Att two Black oak trees marked by sd paith<\/strong><\/p>\n

The \u201a\u00c4\u00faReadington path\u201a\u00c4\u00f9 was Route 523, running from Howell\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s Ferry, which was near \u201a\u00c4\u00faMr. Reading\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s old plantation,\u201a\u00c4\u00f9 to Flemington Junction, which was where Gov. John Reading established his new home. Given that John Reading Jr. was a well-known surveyor, he probably had a lot to do with laying out this road. Exactly where along this \u201a\u00c4\u00fapath\u201a\u00c4\u00f9 the new road was to begin was not mentioned, which makes following this route very difficult.<\/p>\n

4) Thence along As Markt to A white oake tree Marked To the sutherd [southern] of Nathaniel petits plantation<\/strong><\/p>\n

Nathaniel Pettit at this time was in possession of a tract of land formerly owned by Daniel Robins, near the intersection of Routes 523 and 579. He appears as a bordering owner of Isaac Robins in 1737, and mortgaged his own land the same year. This property was near a tract owned by Pettit\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s grandfather, Andrew Heath.4<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

Nathaniel Pettit does not<\/span> appear on the Hammond Maps of early proprietary tracts in Hunterdon County, so we must depend on other sources. He appears as a bordering owner in other surveys of properties that were mortgaged in the 1730s and 1740s. He bordered the road to Ringo\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s Tavern, Isaac Robins, and Thomas Hunt.5<\/a><\/sup> These are the only records we have of Pettit\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s ownership of land in this location.<\/p>\n

As to who this Nathaniel Pettit actually was, it is very hard to say. Records are either missing or contradictory. It is probably not Nathaniel Pettit Sr. of Hopewell, who owned land in Trenton and died in 1718. He wrote his will in 1714\/15, naming among other children a son Nathaniel. The Amwell landowner may have been Nathaniel Pettit Jr. (1676-c.1768) who married Elizabeth Heath in 1708 and may have been the son of either Nathaniel Pettit or Moses Pettit, who also died in 1718. Moses Pettit, yeoman of Mansfield Twp., Burlington County, wrote his will on July 6, 1718, and also named a son Nathaniel.<\/p>\n

In any case, Nathaniel Pettit\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s plantation was a key landmark for this road. I am guessing that between course 3 and 4, the road had turned from 523 into 579. What mystifies me is that no mention was made of Daniel Robins\u201a\u00c4\u00f4 plantation, which was in the same vicinity.<\/p>\n

5) thence Along As Marked to A hickory tree Markt by nishianing kricke [Neshanic Creek]<\/strong><\/p>\n

There are several branches to Neshanic Brook or Creek, and more than one of them crossed Route 579.<\/p>\n

6) thence over sd krick As direct As may be to the school howse on the west seid of ye sd schoole howse<\/strong><\/p>\n

It is pretty close to impossible to say what schoolhouse existed near the Neshanic and Route 579. However, the old Higgins school, on the border of Raritan and Delaware Townships, near today\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s Yard Road, is said to have been in existence since at least 1776. This road record is so much earlier that it is impossible to say anything about this school house with certainty.<\/p>\n

7) thence Along straight As marked to A Black oake tree on the west side of the paith that Leads from James Stouts to Joseph Hicksons<\/strong><\/p>\n

James Stout owned 150 acres just north of Ringoes, which he bought in 1720.6<\/a><\/sup> This is probably the same James Stout (1694-1731) who bought 700 acres from Philip Eddington, Thomas Stevenson & John Reading about 1720 and built his home on the west side of Lindbergh Road near Wertsville.7<\/a><\/sup> Snell wrote (p. 353) that he lived “on the west side of Jacob Manners’ farm, where Abraham Runkle now resides.”<\/p>\n

If Stout was living near Wertsville, then this point in the survey would be the Wertsville Road leading to Ringoes. The description says it was next to Stout\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s property where a path leads to Hixson\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s land. But Hammond does not show Hixson in the vicinity of Ringoes. The Hammond Index has only Abner, Amos, Nathan and Samuel Hixon. No Benjamin or Joseph. All I know about Joseph Hixson is that he was listed among the freeholders of Amwell Township in 1741. He must have been living in or near Ringoes in 1721-22.<\/p>\n

Ringoes tavern was not mentioned. The History of East Amwell<\/em> gives an interesting discussion of known records pertaining to the origins of Ringo\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s Tavern (pp. 9-11), suggesting that John Ringo may have been squatting on land in the village well before this road record was made. But it seems that the tavern had not yet become a landmark.<\/p>\n

8) then along as marked Betweixt the palatins Land And John Warforts<\/strong><\/p>\n

Henry Charlton Beck in his book The Roads of Home<\/em>,8<\/a><\/sup>\u00ac\u2020when discussing German populations in Hunterdon, wrote: \u201a\u00c4\u00faThe conclusion that most of the first settlers in Ringoes were German was supported by a 1721 survey which called it \u201a\u00c4\u00f2the palatin\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s land.\u201a\u00c4\u00f4\u201a\u00c4\u00f9 Apologies for the meta reference. In fact there were many German families living in the vicinity of Ringoes. But the expression \u201a\u00c4\u00fathe palatins land\u201a\u00c4\u00f9 suggests that a large acreage was purchased for several families to live on. There is no record of that being the case.<\/p>\n

I have found no record of John Warford (\u201a\u00c4\u00faWarforts\u201a\u00c4\u00f9) in this area. But there was a connection between John Warford and the Stout family who owned land in course No. 7. John Warford (1683-1769) married Elizabeth Stout, daughter of James Stout and Elizabeth Traux. My notes say he did not appear in Hunterdon until 1729, a few years after this road record. However, he must have married Elizabeth about 1708, judging from the birth of eldest child Job (b.1709) According to his will, his land bordered Wm. Fowler and James Bray, but that would have been in Kingwood twp.<\/p>\n

Warford\u00ac\u2020must have been living on or near today\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s Route 31 in 1721 because the next course seems to take the traveler there.<\/p>\n

9) thence Along As Marked by the east side of the old Indian towne to A red oake tree Marked in or near the Line Betwixt Benjamin Hicksons Land and Ruckmans<\/strong><\/p>\n

The old Indian town is probably Wishalamensy, located just south of the old Dawlis tract on Route 31 at Rocktown, and indicated on Hammond\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s Map G. It is also almost due east of Dr. George Green\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s tract. But there is no sign of Benj. Hixson on the Hammond map. \u00ac\u2020I have little information on Benjamin Hixon, other than that, like Joseph Hixon, he was an Amwell freeholder in 1741.<\/p>\n

If Wishalamensy is in fact the Indian village referred to, it appears that instead of heading directly toward Mt. Airy along Route 179, the Amwell road went due south past the old village of Amwell to Rocktown.<\/p>\n

10) Thence Along ye sd line till it passeth the house of ye sd Ruckman<\/strong><\/p>\n

Who was this \u201a\u00c4\u00faRuckman\u201a\u00c4\u00f9? It could be Thomas Sr., or his son John or son Thomas Jr. How nice it would be to be able to say specifically where this house was located. Hammond Map G (d1) shows a Thomas Ruckman near Route 179 heading toward Mt. Airy.9<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

How did the traveler get from Rocktown to Route 179? The Rocktown-Lambertville Road connects Rocktown with Lambertville, running almost parallel with and south of Route 179. But taking this route would miss the property of Thomas Ruckman. Studying the map, it seems the mostly likely route for this road from Rocktown is the Gulick Road, which would take one toward Mt. Airy.<\/p>\n

A later deed of 1739 refers to land of Bartholomew Thatcher who appears on the Hammond Map as just north of the Alexauken Creek between Mt. Airy and Coryell\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s Ferry. A 1740 loan application shows that Thatcher was bordered by John Ruckman.10<\/a><\/sup> That 1739 road then proceeded to pass by land of George Green.<\/p>\n

In 1758, more than 30 years after the road of 1721\/22, a deed in which Robert Barns and John Severns bought land along the \u201a\u00c4\u00faEllishockin Brook\u201a\u00c4\u00f9 and York Road showed that Thomas Ruckman owned property adjacent to this and to a mill race and mill pond.11<\/a><\/sup> Once again, this is long after the road we are considering, but it seems relevant. The names of Barns and Severns also appear on the Hammond map near that of Thomas Ruckman.<\/p>\n

11) then through the corner of ye sd Ruckman field to A white oake tree<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"Detail<\/a>
Detail of Hammond Map G<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

To get to \u201a\u00c4\u00faye sd Ruckman field,\u201a\u00c4\u00f9 the path had to go across the tract labeled Peter Fisher in the Hammond Map. Ruckman is shown next to land of Joseph Higgins. The map clearly shows the location of Green\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s plantation southeast of Mt. Airy.<\/p>\n

12) thence Along As marked to A Blacke oake tree Marked on ye east side of the old Road that Leads from George Greens old plantation to Cornelius Andersons plantation<\/strong><\/p>\n

George Green (c.1680-?) was probably the brother of Samuel Green, one of the earliest settlers in Amwell Township. He was living in Gloucester County in 1696 when he had his earmarks registered. He may have been a little rough with his wife Hannah in 1701, when the Burlington Court held him on recognizance of \u00ac\u00a350 and ordered him to be \u201a\u00c4\u00faof good behavior towards all his Magesties Liege People, especially to Hannah his wife.12<\/a><\/sup> That same year he had 400 acres surveyed near Mt. Airy.13<\/a><\/sup> There is little record of him after that until 1725 when his brother Samuel surveyed 610 acres for him in Hope Township, which he mortgaged in 1737.14<\/a><\/sup> A George Green died intestate in Hardwick, Sussex Co. in 1777, but was probably Dr. George’s nephew, the son of Samuel Green.<\/p>\n

As for the road, I believe this would in effect be Route 179 to Mt. Airy (near George Green\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s plantation), then down the Mt. Airy-Harbourton Road to Route 579 toward Trenton, but somewhere turning off toward the Titusville area and the plantation of Cornelius Anderson.<\/p>\n

Or continuing on to Coryell\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s Ferry and then south along the river to Titusville, as the Map of 1781 seems to show. But then why not mention Coryell\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s Ferry?–because Emanuel Coryell did not show up until 1729. However, I doubt this second route. The fact that the road return said so little about the route from Green\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s plantation to Cornelius Anderson\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s suggests that it was familiar to most people.\u00ac\u2020Hunter and Porter wrote (p. 186) that the Harbourton-Mt. Airy Road was laid out about 1710 to connect the Trenton-Harbourton Road (Route 579) with the Old York Road. They also wrote that it was \u201a\u00c4\u00farelaid in 1736,\u201a\u00c4\u00f9 and again in 1807. That\u00ac\u2020’relay’ of 1736 noted\u00ac\u2020that it replaced a road that had been in use for near 30 years, referring, I believe, to part of this road of 1721. (A\u00ac\u2020description of the 1736 road will appear in a future article.)<\/p>\n

So, here, finally, is the route of the Amwell Road of 1721, as best I can tell.<\/p>\n

\"Estimated<\/a>
Estimated route of the Amwell Road, 1721<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Correction, 6\/22\/14: \u00ac\u2020A reader pointed out to me that Dr. George Green, as he was called on the Hammond map, probably did not die in 1777, and that general consensus is that that other George Green was the son of Samuel Green.<\/em><\/p>\n

Footnotes<\/strong>:<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

There is something fascinating about old roads, especially when their routes differ from the ones we know today. One of the very oldest roads in Hunterdon County was “layed out”\u00ac\u2020in December 1721 and recorded in January 1721\/22. Here is the full text, as transcribed in Snell\u201a\u00c4\u00f4s History of Hunterdon County (p. 347), which I will […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[241,248,4,397,257],"tags":[30,21,73],"class_list":["post-8328","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-families","category-green-families","category-hunterdon-county","category-pettit","category-reading-families","tag-early-legislation","tag-early-settlers","tag-roads","has-post-title","has-post-date","has-post-category","has-post-tag","has-post-comment","has-post-author",""],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodspeedhistories.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8328","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodspeedhistories.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodspeedhistories.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodspeedhistories.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodspeedhistories.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8328"}],"version-history":[{"count":46,"href":"https:\/\/goodspeedhistories.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8328\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10087,"href":"https:\/\/goodspeedhistories.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8328\/revisions\/10087"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodspeedhistories.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8328"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodspeedhistories.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8328"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodspeedhistories.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8328"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}