Well, it looks as if I can\u2019t get more than one year\u2019s worth of information in a single post. Can\u2019t help it\u2014the times were just too interesting.<\/p>\n
In January 1680\/81, Gov. Andros, who had been carrying out the wishes of his patron, James Duke of York, was recalled to England to answer charges of financial corruption. His heavy-handed tactics, especially in East New Jersey, had made him a liability to James, who was having problems of his own. Andros returned home in May 1681, but instead of imprisonment, he was knighted, after the charges were dropped in December 1681.<\/p>\n
Needless to say, in Carteret\u2019s colony of East New Jersey Andros was not missed. However, except for the hapless John Fenwick, West New Jersey residents were only moderately tormented by Andros. Still, they must have been relieved that he was gone. Unfortunately, like a bad penny, Andros would be back.1<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n Once James had deeded the right of government to Edward Byllinge (on Aug. 6, 1680), the other English proprietors, not wanting to rock the boat, elected Byllinge governor. Not long afterwards, Byllinge wrote a pamphlet designed to encourage more settlement of his province. At least, I think it was Byllinge. The author or authors of \u201cThe Present State of the Colony of West-Jersey, Anno Dom. 1681\u201d are not known. But who else would have written it? William Penn? Perhaps. But Penn had his mind on a new colony, and Byllinge had the most incentive to promote West New Jersey. Here are some excerpts from this interesting tract:<\/p>\n Some few Years since [he could only mean two or three years], there were several Printed Papers published, giving Account of this Colony, which gave Encouragement to many Persons to Purchase Lands, and Transport Themselves, Servants, and Families thither, who have settled Themselves in that Colony, upon the Great River of Delaware, and the Creeks and Harbors thereof; and have Built some Towns apt for Trade, with Convenient Ports, where large Ships of Considerable Burthen have already unloaded, especially at Burlington, Scituate about a Hundred and Fifty Miles [really only 100 miles] from the Sea up the said River.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n And there are also many Families, who have settled Themselves in that Country; some about Husbandry, others have Erected Mills for Grinding Corn, and several other necessary Tradesmen have There settled Themselves in Towns, and in the Country, fit for their Respective Undertakings . . . They have also Coopers, Smiths, Carpenters, Bricklayers, Wheel-Wrights, Plow-Wrights, and Mill-Wrights, Ship Carpenters, and other Trades which work upon what the Country produces for Manufacturies. Then there comes a paragraph describing \u201cthe Title of the said Colony\u201d in which it was noted that the Duke [of York]<\/p>\n \u201cGranted the Power of Government of the said West-Jersey unto the said Edward Billinge, His Deputy or Deputyes, Commissioner or Commissioners, for Governing and Settling the said West-Jersey; And that in as full and ample Manner, to all Intents and Purposes, as the same was Granted to Him by the King. All which Laws and Settlements are and are to be Made and Done with the Consent and Approbation of the Proprietors and Free-holders thereof. So that, neither Customs, Charge, Imposition, nor any other services or Taxes whatsoever, are to be Imposed upon the Inhabitants, but by their own Consent in a Free and General-Assembly of the Proprietors and Free-Holders of the said Colony; which Assembly is to meet once every Year.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n This paragraph seems to argue both for and against Byllinge as author. On the one hand, he emphasizes the conveyance of the right of government to him from James Duke of York, and on the other hand, he describes the power of the General Assembly. But perhaps that was because Byllinge had not yet concluded, as he soon would, that an Assembly could be a great irritation to a governor.<\/p>\n \u201cThe Present State\u201d also declared that provision had been made for \u201cliberty of conscience in matters of religion\u201d and described \u201cthe method laid down for sale and division of West Jersey\u201d which \u201cis by Proprieties.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cIn each of these Hundred Parts or Proprieties, the Quantity of Acres, cannot be absolutely Ascertain\u2019d; but its generally judged to be Twenty Thousand Acres, and upwards; but some have accounted each Propriety to contain much more. . . . The Dividing and Laying out the Land is done by Commissioners appointed upon the Place. And there is a large Tract of Land, containing above Sixty English Miles, lying along the River of Delaware, taken up, and Bought of the Natives: The Commissioners lay out (at present) about Five or Six Thousand Acres of Land for a Propriety out of this Tract, as People come over that have Bought: By which Means, the People settle near together, for their Conveniency of Trade and Commerce.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n At the time of writing, \u201cSeveral of the [proprieties] remains [sic] yet to be sold.\u201d2<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n Following James\u2019 grant to Edward Byllinge, Penn decided that he needed to establish a new Quaker colony, controlled by him rather than Byllinge. So, he petitioned the king for a grant of land, and, due to the debts that Charles II owed to Penn\u2019s father, the request was granted on March 4, 1680\/81 in the form of Pennsylvania\u2014in other words, everything west of the Delaware River. The only shortcoming was that the land had no direct access to the sea. So, Penn turned to his friend the Duke of York, who still had ownership of \u201call that Town of New-Castle otherwise called Delaware and Fort thereunto lying between Maryland and New Jersey in America.\u201d Penn managed to persuade James to grant that land to him in addition to Pennsylvania.3<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n A surprising tidbit I learned from author Mary Lou Lustig was that William Penn had a high opinion of the governing ability of Edmund Andros. She speculated that it might have been because of his friendship with the Duke of York. Penn thought highly enough of Andros to actually offer him the job of governor of Pennsylvania. Given the mercenary and authoritarian tendencies of Edmund Andros, this comes as something of a shock. Fortunately for the Pennsylvania Quakers, Andros turned down the offer.<\/p>\n Edward Byllinge took it upon himself to name Samuel Jennings to serve as governor in West New Jersey. He did not use the term deputy governor, but that was in effect what he meant. In a pamphlet written in 1698,4<\/a><\/sup> Jennings claimed that the Friends understood that Byllinge took the position of governor in trust, \u201cand would use it no otherwise.\u201d Byllinge claimed he had to take it because only a single person could be named governor. Jennings quoted William Penn as saying that Byllinge solicited the position \u201cin the name of the People, that they might be able to make good what they had sold them.\u201d<\/p>\n Jennings arrived in Burlington in September 1680. As mentioned in the previous post, the residents of West New Jersey did not realize that Jennings had been named deputy governor when he arrived, and he kept it quiet for a little while. His name did not appear in the minutes of the Burlington Court for October 4, 1680. Jennings wrote that he knew that Byllinge had no right to \u201cgrant commissions\u201d before the first Assembly had met, and after arriving in Burlington, Jennings met with \u201cas many as I could of the most antient and considerable of the Inhabitants here\u201d to inform them that he would not impose upon them except as they thought he might be useful. William Penn, \u201cbelieving Jennings a worthy man, advised the inhabitants to accept him.\u201d5<\/a><\/sup> In the interests of maintaining order, these \u201cantient Inhabitants\u201d chose to keep Jennings\u2019 commission as deputy governor. Edward Byllinge also sent a letter proclaiming his intent to settle the affair to everyone\u2019s content and to settle himself in West New Jersey as soon as possible. The letter came on a ship carrying passengers like William Biddle, Elias Farr and Benjamin Scott.<\/p>\n The first meeting of the Burlington Court for 1681 took place on March 25th. The eight commissioners solemnly promised (as good Quakers, they did not swear) as \u201cChosen Commissioners for the Province of West New Jersey\u201d to discharge their duties according to the law of the Province (i.e., the Concessions & Agreements). Samuel Jennings was not identified as the governor; he was just one of the Commissioners.<\/p>\n William Emley was elected \u201cby the Common Vote of the People\u201d as Sheriff \u201cof that part of the Province of West New Jersey from St. Pinck to the Creek called Oldmans Creek.\u201d Thomas Revel was elected register for the same area, while James Nevill was elected register for the Salem Tenth, running from Oldman\u2019s Creek to the Cohansey. Daniel Leeds was elected surveyor of land from St. Pinck\u2019s to Oldmans, and his fees were set: 10 shillings for the first 100 acres; 5 shillings for the next 100 acres; 2 shillings 6 pence for every 100 acres thereafter in one parcel. For public lands he would be paid 10 shillings a day, plus extra if he went further than 12 miles from his home. All persons wishing to lay out new lands for themselves had to come to the commissioners to have them designate a surveyor. It was ordered that all persons should bring in their deeds to be recorded. And, finally, all freeholders were ordered to come forth and sign the Concessions & Agreements.<\/p>\n Two constables were elected: one (Thomas Wood) for \u201cthe Falls and the Liberties thereof\u201d (the Trenton area) and John Woolston for Burlington and the Liberties thereof. This seems to refer to the first (Yorkshire) tenth and the second (London) tenth. For the rest of 1681, the court heard various civil complaints. At the first session of 1682, also in March, the court acknowledged Samuel Jennings as governor, who sat with the Commissioners. There was nothing in the minutes about new officeholders. The Commissioners were not referred to as Justices until September 1682.<\/p>\n Back in March 1677, a full proprietary share was sold by Edward Byllinge along with Penn, Lawrie and Lucas to seven Irish Friends. The next month another full share was sold to an additional five Irish Friends. But they did not send settlers to West New Jersey until 1681, when they took up land in the third tenth, from Timber Creek to Pennsauken Creek [see Map here<\/a>]. Because the first purchasers were Irish, the name \u201cIrish Tenth\u201d was often used instead of the Third Tenth. Although many of the Irish purchasers did eventually make the trip to West New Jersey, most of the later settlers there were English.<\/p>\n Two ships from Ireland arrived on September 19, 1681, having been outfitted by William Penn. One was named \u201cYe Owners Adventure,\u201d although perhaps Penn was not responsible for the name. It was \u201ca narrow-sterned vessel called a pink,\u201d which set sail from Dublin to the Delaware River. On the ship were William Bates, Thomas Thackera, Mark Newlin [Newbie?], George Goldsmith (single) and Thomas Sharp (single).6<\/a><\/sup>\u00a0Some of the other Irish Quakers who bought shares and then made the trip to the Irish Tenth were Anthony Sharp, Robert Turner, Robert Zane, William Cooper, John Thompson, Andrew Robinson, Richard Hunter, John Dennis, William Clark, and Thomas Atherton.<\/p>\n These Irish were not the first to settle near Gloucester. There were many there with Dutch or Swedish names, who had probably been living there for a decade or more\u2014people like Peter and Woolley Dalbo; John and Wooley Derickson (or Erickson); Gasperon Fish; Jasper Gaest; Lasse (Lacey), Hance and Mounts Halton; Hermanius Holme; Lacye, Lawrence and Mons Holton; Andreas, Lacy, and Mathias Hoomen or Hoeman; Peter Jaego; Mons Janson; Canute, Cornelius, Juste and Mons Justeson; Hance Lassey alias Coleman; Nicolas Matson alias Lawson; Peter Dalbo Matson; Justa and Morton Orrion or Orien; Paule Paulson; Hans and Woola Peterson; Peter Ponyon alias Erickson; Garret and John Van Ima or Van Iman; Joseph and Nicholas Yong.<\/p>\n I cannot say which of these names were Dutch and which were Swedish. They were certainly outnumbered by English and Irish names, but their presence was significant. Generally, they were not appointed or elected to positions like commissioner in the early years, probably because their English wasn\u2019t good enough. But in 1684, when constable Hance Hopman was given a warrant to bring certain persons before the court to set forth their land claims, the names of those appearing were Mons Jonson, Peter Johnson, Hance Woolston and Daniel Livezey; also James Ostason als [alias] Hance Lassey Coleman and Neales Matson als [alias] Lawson. This confusion over names must have been caused by language difficulties.<\/p>\nEdward Byllinge<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n. . . Their Houses are some Built of Brick, some of Timber, Plaister\u2019d and Ceil\u2019d, as in England [the traditional Tudor or Jacobean house]: . . . And what they do not Spend, or have to Spare, they sell to their Neighbours, and Transport the Rest to the other American-Plantations. . . .<\/p><\/blockquote>\nWilliam Penn<\/strong><\/h3>\n
Samuel Jennings <\/span><\/h3>\n
The Burlington Court<\/span><\/h3>\n
The Irish Tenth <\/span><\/h3>\n
Other Settlers in the Irish Tenth<\/span><\/h3>\n
The First Assembly of West New Jersey<\/span><\/h3>\n