The eight children were: Anchor, George, Absalom, Gabriel, Ambrose, Mary, Amos, and a daughter.
1. Anchor Fox (c.1728-aft 1762) was probably born on the Fox plantation in Amwell, northwest of Rosemont, although the family long believed she was born in a ship lying at anchor. Perhaps this was a creative way of dealing with a difficult name. In some sources, her name appears as Anclie or Auche, which sounds Dutch, even though her family was English.
A search of databases on the internet failed to show the name Anchor except in the case of “Think Baby Names,” where it was identified as a boy’s name, meaning ‘stability.’ Variant forms were Ancher or Anker, and it is thought to be an occupational name. Not likely with a little girl.
About 1750, Anchor Fox married Uriah Bonham (c.1724-1809), the son of Hezekiah Bonham and (probably) Anna Hunt [see Snell, pg 397]. The Bonhams came to Piscataway in Middlesex County from Barnstable, Massachusetts about 1670 , but in the early 1690s, Hezekiah Bonham and his family removed to settle in Maidenhead. Hezekiah had an extensive family, but only one of the Bonham children settled in Kingwood near Rosemont. John Lequear wrote that Uriah Bonham came to the area to work as a school teacher about 1763 or earlier. I would guess earlier, based on the dates of his children’s births. Anchor Fox and Uriah Bonham were important to the local history of the area, so I will save them for a future post.
2. George Fox (c.1729-1760), the fourth in the series. He was born sometime between 1729 and 1732, the first son and second child of George (iii) and Mary Fox. He took up the occupation of cooper, which was useful in conjunction with the operation of a mill. He married his wife Rachel around 1750. Her family is unknown. On June 7, 1760, George Fox wrote his will. It is from his will that we know that George and Rachel had two sons, Charles and George, and some daughters, all born between 1750 and 1760, and “an expected child.” George Fox must have suffered some sudden disease or accident, because he was only 31 when he wrote his will, which was recorded on June 25, 1760. His widow Rachel was named sole Executrix. The will was witnessed by Malakiah Bonham, Joshua Waterhouse, John Johnson and Gabriel Fox. The abstract in N.J. Archives mentions real and personal estate, without details. I have no information on the eldest son Charles, born about 1751. Younger son George (v) will appear in a future post.
3. Absalom Fox, born about 1734, in Kingwood or Amwell, Hunterdon, NJ, married about 1758, Christian Bonham (1737-1821), daughter of Amariah Bonham (brother of Uriah Bonham) and his first wife (see Linda’s comment below). Shortly after marrying, it is believed they left Hunterdon for Loudon Co., Virginia, where their first four children were born (1759-1765). Then they resettled at Amwell, Washington Co., Pennsylvania, where the last four were born (1772-1781). Absalom died about 1793, age 59-60, in Lone Pine, Washington Co., PA and Christian Bonham Fox died in 1821, age 84, in Springsboro, Warren, Ohio. (This information comes from online family trees, and therefore, I cannot vouch for it. I have made some corrections based on Linda’s comments.)
Before leaving for Virginia, Absalom had to sell his father’s mills. Snell and Lequear wrote that the mills fell into disuse after George Fox died, and that Samuel Runk started a new mill further north up the stream.
3. Gabriel Fox, born about 1736, performed his duties as his father’s executor with his brother George in 1754. About 1756, Gabriel Fox married Ann Warford (c.1727 – aft 1761), daughter of John Warford and Elizabeth Stout of Kingwood. They had a daughter Ivea about 1757. In 1763, Gabriel Fox of Kingwood bought land from Richard Bennet, and then sold it to John Snyder, also of Kingwood [Deed 1-449]. A mortgage of 1775 shows that Gabriel Fox bordered land of Noah Hixson in Kingwood [Mtg 1-217]. Probably after the end of the Revolution, Gabriel and Ann Fox removed to Hampshire Co., Virginia, where Gabriel died in 1799, age 63. Ann survived her husband, but I have no information on when or where she died. Their daughter Ivea died in Hampshire Co., Virginia, about 1787 at the age of 30.
4. Ambrose Fox was born abt 1737. He was provided for in his father’s will of 1754, but I have no further information on him.
5. Mary Fox (c.1738- ?) is interesting enough to get her own post.
6. Amos Fox was born Sep. 7, 1739, Kingwood, Hunterdon, NJ. He was provided for in his father’s will of 1754, sharing land with brother Ambrose. Perhaps Ambrose and Amos both sold their land and left Hunterdon County. One source says that Amos married Annie Combs about 1759 and had 9 children (Dinah, Morris, Isaac, Gabriel, Gideon, Lydia, Annie, Mary and Amos).
7. Some sources show a daughter (7th child) for George and Mary Fox, born about 1741, and married to William Alger. There was an Alger family in Piscataway in the late 17th century, associated with the Bonhams. Perhaps William Alger was connected with them. I have no further information.
The next post will discuss the fifth George Fox.
Correction: Hezekiah Bonham came from Barnstable, Mass., not New Hampshire, as originally stated. See comments.
Brownie and Jim
August 8, 2009 @ 4:53 pm
>>"The Bonhams came to Piscataway from New Hampshire."<<
The Bonhams came to Piscataway from BARNSTABLE, MA. Nicholas and Hannah Fuller married in Barnstable,and had at least three children there before arriving in Piscataway where the rest of their children were born. Where is your documentation on New Hampshire, Marfy?
Marfy Goodspeed
August 9, 2009 @ 7:48 am
Brownie: That was my mistake. As you know, many of the settlers of Piscataway, New Jersey had spent time in Piscataqua, New Hampshire before moving to New Jersey. Some of them married into the Bonham family, which, as you say, came from Barnstable, Massachusetts. That whole migration of New Englanders to New Jersey is an interesting subject. Thanks for the correction.
Linda
March 10, 2012 @ 5:54 am
Love your site – you make everything so interesting to read! I am enjoying the Fox Family story since my last note, after a delay to visit the Sutton site, also amazing. Amariah Bonham’s wife Mary Drake was not Christian Fox’s mother (3 supra). Mary Drake was either his second or third wife as of c. 1750. Absalom Fox’s last tax appeared in West Bethlehem Tp., Washington Co., PA for 1792 on 100 Ac. [Note – tax men visited the following year just as the IRS now]. His land was not taxed for 1793, only his sons still appear, but for the year 1794 “Widdow” Fox was taxed. The next extant tax for 1796, Christian Fox was taxed with 100 Ac., so my conclusion is Absalom died 1793 and before the tax year 1794.
Thank you so much for sharing your excellent research. I really appreciate your site, and all the time you put into both. PS I very seldom turn my computer on because I find sites like yours and cannot shut down until the wee hours – L
Marfy Goodspeed
March 10, 2012 @ 6:55 am
Linda, that is an interesting study of tax records. I will correct the post since your information is very convincing. I wonder if Absalom Fox and Mary Drake might have married earlier than 1750. Olive B. Rowland (“Genealogical Notes on Sutton and Rittenhouse Families”) cites a sale of real estate in 1743 by Absalom Bonham, yeoman of Piscataway and Mary M. Bonham of same to Richard Taylor.
Nancy Eckert
January 17, 2016 @ 11:47 pm
Anchor Fox was my 5th great grandmother. I had to prove that I was a descendant of the Mayflower passenger, Edward Fuller, through her. The Mayflower Society accepted me in November 2015, meaning that they agreed with all of the documentation of the descendants and their line carriers which I provided them, at my own cost I might add. Regarding Anchor Fox, I based her birth on the Rowland book and chart. Anchor was born at sea, most likely at the harbor. You mention that the name “Anchor” implies stability. Yes, it does. And just think how stable and overjoyed that humble family must’ve felt when they saw land for the first time since leaving England! Plus they had a healthy baby girl as a welcoming present. :) These people were not looking through a book of names to come up with “Anchor”. Take a look at the children’s names these early settlers chose and you’ll find mostly English or Biblical names, some you don’t even hear at all today. Her name, I believe, was intentionally given to her to mark this joyous occasion. And, incidentally, the name, Anchor, was carried on for about 5 generations after.
Larry Hoke
August 16, 2020 @ 10:02 pm
Hi Ms Eckert/Ms Goodspeed!
I’m struggling thru a Mayflower Society application I’m doing for my wife, a descendant of Absalom Fox & Christian Bonham. Her tree goes thru their son Bonham Fox…. therein lies the problem. Not much out there on Bonham Fox to the degree necessary. Am wondering the route you took thru Anchor to the Fullers, as my wife’s tree goes thru Bonham Fox thru Christian Bonham thru her father Amariah to the Fullers. I assume your path was thru Uriah Bonham (Amariah’s brother), thru Hezekiah, etc, etc. Please contact me privately as I’d love to get some insights from you and see if you coincidently have some information that could assist or could help my novice genealogical research skills with this piece of the Fox family. Thank You….. Larry
Nancy Eckert
January 18, 2016 @ 6:53 am
Postscript to Anchor Fox: I went back to my Mayflower Society Application for Membership and discovered that they based their information on Anchor from a book on the Bonham Family and also on one called The First Settlers of New Jersey. The Society did not indicate where Anchor was born, just that she was born c. 1729. They did not dispute my claim about her being born at the harbor, but they didn’t verify it either. I still believe the harbor was the birthplace due to my previous argument. The early settlers, as I mentioned before, gave names, especially to daughters that conjured up emotion. Such names as Thankful, Deliverance, Patience, Prudence, Temperance, Experience come to mind. This is why I’m not throwing away the explanation of Anchor’s name.
Marfy Goodspeed
January 18, 2016 @ 8:10 am
I agree with you, Nancy. And it explains why her descendants liked to use her name, as it was probably a cherished family story.