The Saxtonville Mill Changes Hands

by Marfy Goodspeed on May 9, 2012

in Delaware Township

The mill once owned by Mahlon Cooper and Robert Curry in Saxtonville became a hot potato during the War of 1812 and thereafter. It changed hands several times before Nicholas Baird acquired it in 1823.

Note: It has been awhile since I last wrote about life in Raven Rock. Here are the previous posts: Saxton in Raven Rock, Reading Howell’s Map, The Bull’s Island Bridge, and Saxton’s Saxtonville.

A Curious Set of Transactions

By 1814, while the War of 1812 was still going strong and the British blockade was being tightened, the coastal states, including New Jersey, were beginning to suffer from want of trade. Up until this time, the population was rapidly increasing, banks were being established and manufactures were thriving. It was during this period of  prosperity that Nathaniel Saxton, unaware of the impending war, invested his money in Saxtonville. Then the war came, and by 1814 the economy had slowed down enough to hurt.

Perhaps it was this state of affairs that motivated Nathaniel Saxton and George Holcombe to find a way to make some money out of the old Cooper & Curry mill. Of the two partners, Holcombe was the one feeling the pinch the most. He had over-extended himself in the previous years, and his debts were catching up with him.

On July 1, 1814, Nathaniel Saxton sold his moiety or half share in the 10-acre mill lot to George Holcombe, now a New Brunswick merchant, for $7000.1 At first sight this seems more than foolhardy on Holcombe’s part. $7,000 was quite a lot of money in 1814. But the method in his madness was that he was consolidating title to the mill lot, eliminating the two moieties, so that he could sell the lot in fee simple. And that is what he did, the next day, on July 2, 1814. He sold 9.55 acres to Myndert Wilson Jr. of Amwell for $13,000.2 This left Holcombe with a profit of $6000, a thousand less than Saxton, but then Saxton had been the one to supervise operation of the mill. Since Saxton had only paid $7 for his moiety, and Holcombe only $50, the two were making a handsome profit.

Actually, Holcombe’s profit was only on paper because he gave a mortgage to Wilson in the amount of $6000 on the day after the deed was signed.3 This suggests that Nathaniel Saxton got his $7000 from the sale, but Holcombe was left with a mortgage on his hands that might not be paid off. As far as I can tell, Wilson did not get a second mortgage to cover the balance of the $13,000. Where he found the extra $7000 I cannot say. Wilson was also something of a speculator, so he must have had some resources.

The next transaction makes it pretty clear that Holcombe was in a bigger hurry to get out of Saxtonville than Saxton was. On July 2, 1814, the same day that George Holcombe Jr. sold the 9.55-acre mill lot to Myndert Wilson, he conveyed his half interest in the 30-acre lot (the lower half of Bull’s Island) to Nathaniel Saxton for $1,000, along with his half interest in 0.55 acres, a right-of-way that had been part of the 10-acre mill lot.4 This eliminated Holcombe’s holdings in Raven Rock.

The 30+ acre lot was bordered by Jabez White and Bulls Creek and ran across Bulls Island. The 0.55 acre lot was bordered by Myndert Wilson’s mill lot, the road, Joseph Rodman and Saxton’s other land. The $1000 paid by Saxton to Holcombe might have been considered a balancing out between the two, since Holcombe had paid $7000 to Saxton for his share in the mill.

Bull’s Island

Two years before this sale, Saxton had purchased the northern half of the island from Joseph and Jonathan Townsend of Solebury, PA.5 According to Phyllis D’Autrechy, once Saxton had ownership of the two halves, “he promptly named [the whole island] Saxton’s Island and described it as being opposite Saxtonville. But excepted from Saxton’s ownership of the upper portion of the island was the use of the Prime Hope Fishery.”6 Once again, we have a case of consolidation for the purpose of a future sale. On December 5, 1815, Nathaniel Saxton sold the island, still in two parts, to William and Joseph Dilworth of Bucks County for $4800.7

Nathaniel Saxton’s Stone House

The deed of sale for the lower half of “Saxton’s Island” and Mindert Wilson’s mortgage both contain a most intriguing item in the list of metes and bounds: a course that runs north 61 degrees 45 minutes west 11 chains to

“a black oak in the road standing south 24 degrees 30 minutes east 66 links from the southwesterly corner of said Saxton’s stone house, thence still by said Saxton’s Land south 63 degrees west 4 chains to a Buttonwood near the head of the Grist Mill race on the bank of Bulls Creek.”

This puts Saxton’s stone house adjacent to the mill lot, which was some distance from the building known today as the Saxtonville Tavern. Saxton still owned the tavern lot. In fact, that lot would be the last piece of property in Saxtonville that he would sell, and not until 1836. Unfortunately, judging by the metes and bounds, it appears that that stone house that bordered the mill lot is now lying under Route 29.

Did Saxton live in either of these houses? It’s hard to say. He still had his legal business in Flemington. I am inclined to think the house near the mill lot was used by him around 1809-1810 when he first became involved in the milling business, but that he returned to Flemington after that and rented out his houses in Raven Rock. By 1815, he was living in Lebanon Township where he had other land investments. Some previous histories of Raven Rock have suggested that by 1815, Nathaniel Saxton had acquired all of Raven Rock and Bull’s Island and was resident there. But clearly that is not the case. Although he held onto his Saxtonville Tavern property, he let the rest go, and moved on to other endeavors. By the 1820s, he was again living in Flemington.

Who Was Myndert Wilson?

Myndert is a Dutch name, and although there were many Dutch families living in Hunterdon County, only Wilson bore the name of Myndert. Here is what I have gathered from some very superficial online research:

Myndert Wilson of Amwell descended from the immigrant Hendrick Wilson who is supposed to have born at sea in 1623 and settled with his family in what became New Netherland. He died on Long Island about 1710. His son Myndert was born about 1672, married Maria Brouchard in 1694 and had a son Hendrick the next year. Hendrick married Annetje Pieters, left Long Island and moved to Hillsborough, Somerset County, where the couple had son Myndert about 1719. Myndert Wilson married Anna Goulder in 1749 and had son Mindert/Myndert on June 11, 1757. He married Jane Van Arsdalen about 1781 and remained in Hillsborough Township. In 1805, Myndert Wilson, whom I will hereafter call Mindert Sr., was a deacon in the Dutch Reformed Church at Millstone. The next year, 1806, he was taxed as a resident of Hillsborough, Somerset County.8

Myndert Sr. and Jane Wilson had son Myndert (the fourth in the line, and hereafter, Myndert Jr.) on July 16, 1783. He married Ann (surname not known) around 1805.

Myndert Jr. first appears in Hunterdon County land records as a resident of “Reading” (Readington) with wife Ann. On April 11, 1809, he and Ann sold land in Readington to Nicholas Ott.9  There was no recital to explain how Wilson got this property, and no earlier deed recorded. In this and future deeds, his name was usually spelled Mindert.

Wilson’s next appearance in the deeds was in 1813, when he bought land in Readington from Joseph Hall of Bridgewater. The deed does not say where Wilson was living this year, but it was probably Bridgewater because on May 20, 1814, Wilson and wife Ann of Bridgewater, Somerset County, sold the lot purchased from Joseph Hall to Ambrose Rice, and gave him a mortgage on the property.

Four months later, on July 2, 1814, Wilson, now a resident of Amwell, purchased the Raven Rock mill lot. He and wife Ann got a mortgage of $6000 from George Holcombe, and must have somehow come up with the remaining $7000, for the purchase price of $13,000, but I have no idea how he did it.

Later in November 1814, Mindert Wilson bought a ten-acre lot from Abraham Heed, and in December of 1814, he witnessed a deed between Nathaniel Saxton and Joseph Rodman, for sale of 34.25 acres.10

In March of 1815, after less than a year, Wilson was ready to move on. The effects of the war-time economy were probably hurting the milling business, but Wilson was just naturally peripatetic, so the economy probably made no difference to him. Wilson swapped properties with James Major of Kingwood by purchasing from Major a tract of 69.42 acres in Kingwood, not far from Saxtonville, for $3,471, and on the same day, Mindert Wilson and wife Ann sold the 10-acre mill lot to Major for the same $13,000.11 However, in addition to the mill lot, this deed included the ten acres that Wilson had purchased from Abraham Heed the previous November.

The restless Wilson next turned his eye toward Flemington. In 1815 he purchased the tavern house in that town from William Case for $3600, and also a one-acre lot there from Maurice McConnell.12 The next year he had moved again. In 1816, he and wife Ann were living in New Brunswick when they bought land in Readington and sold the Flemington tavern lot to Henry Suydam of Franklin Township, Somerset Co. In 1818 he was living on his land in Readington Township when he bought a farm of 103.6 acres in Amwell from Abraham Williamson. This property was located on the road from Skunktown to Holcombe’s Mill, today’s Route 604, between Sergeantsville and Headquarters. This was another of Wilson’s land swaps, for two days later, he and wife Ann sold to Abraham Williamson the Kingwood farm he had purchased from James Major in 1815. Wilson clearly had no interest in living on his Amwell farm. He had other irons in the fire.

Just before these transactions, Wilson had advertised the sale of his mill property in Readington Township, and soon afterwards, sold it with some adjacent lots to Wm. S. Conover of Hopewell for (once again) $13,000.13 Around the same time, May 1818, Wilson bought a farm of 85+ acres in Hopewell from Conover. Wilson was “of Readington” when he purchased from Conover, but soon afterwards, he was “of Hopewell” when he sold that property to Andrew Weart, along with a ten-acre lot in Amwell, for $9000.14

Mindert and Ann Wilson did not stay long in Hopewell Township. Less than a year later, in March 1819, they were living in Montgomery Township when they sold a 25-acre lot on the South Branch in Kingwood Township to Abraham Ditmars for $5000. Probably soon after this, Ann Wilson died. I say this because for the first time, Mindert Wilson, still living in Montgomery, sold property on his own on August 27, 1819. He sold that 103.6 acres on the road from Skunktown to Holcombe’s Mill to his father, Mindert Wilson Sr. of Hillsborough for $2886.15

That is the last time that Mindert Wilson Jr.’s name appears in the deeds of Hunterdon County.16 I cannot say for sure, but he may have been the Mindert Wilson who died on March 31, 1840 in Bedminster, Somerset County, at age 66. As for that Amwell farm of 103.6 acres, three years later, on March 1, 1822, Minder Wilson Sr. and wife Jane of Hillsborough sold it to John I. Stryker of same for $1500, for a loss of $1386.17

Next post, the travails of James Major.

  1. Deed 23-124; also see Deed 14-467.
  2. Deed 23-125
  3. H. C. Mortgage 6:005.
  4. Deed 23-417
  5. Deed 20-342
  6. Phyllis D’Autrechy, Hunterdon County Fisheries, pg. 17.
  7. Deed 25-060
  8. See also “Historical discourse on occasion of the centennial anniversary of the Reformed Dutch Church of Millstone” by Edward Tanjore Corwin, J.J. Reed, printer, 1866 (Google Books), pg 95, footnote on pg 46-47.
  9. Deed 15-634
  10. Deed 23-420
  11. Deed 23-527
  12. Deeds 24-007 and 24-240
  13. Deed 29-169
  14. Deeds 28-446, 29-202
  15. Deed 29-600
  16. A search of deeds in Somerset County will no doubt add more to the story.
  17. Deed 33-335

{ 0 comments }

Delaware Township Post Offices

by Marfy Goodspeed on May 5, 2012

in Delaware Township

I have listed the post offices first in chronological order and then alphabetically with their postmasters. I am tempted to add more biographical details, but that would turn this post into a book. Stockton has been included only for the time that it was a part of Delaware Township. It did not become an independent borough until 1898.

Chronological Listing

1817  Prallsville
1827  Sergeantsville (formerly Skunktown)
1832  Saxtonville (Raven Rock)
1845  Croton, name changed from Allerton.
1853  Bool’s Island/Raven Rock
1853  Stockton Post Office
1856  Locktown
1856  Oakdale
1858  Sand Brook
1884  Rosemont
1887  Grover Post Office

Alphabetical Listing, Post Offices and Postmasters

Note: I will combine the Saxtonville and Bool’s Island/Raven Rock post offices into one entry, under Raven Rock.

The store and post office at Croton, later owned by the Etzel family

Click on this picture to get a better look at the gentlemen on the porch, the post office sign, and the condition of the building, which looks like it has had some rough use.

Croton

This post office was established on April 18, 1846, when the name was changed from Allerton to Croton. According to Hubert Schmidt, it was named for the Croton Dam in New York State. It was discontinued on June 29, 1935, when RFD service was provided from Flemington. There were 8 postmasters there in 90 years:

1846 Apr 18   John S. Hockenbury
1850 Apr 26  Johnson Gary
1852 Aug 7    Newton Gary
1856 Apr 5    John S. Bush
1862 Aug 12  Holcombe Warford
1874 Feb 21  George T. Arnwine
1875 Sep 15   Smith Fields
1914 Jun 6    George Cronce, until 1935

Here’s an example of how giving biographical detail could turn this into a book. Smith Fields shows up in several census years. In 1860 he was 37, working as a clerk, living in Flemington with wife Elizabeth 33 and children Samuel 10 and Mary 8. In 1870 he was in Raritan Township, which might have been in the east half of Croton, keeping an oyster saloon, while son Samuel, by then 21, was working there also. The old Etzel store, pictured above, was also situated in the Raritan Township side of Croton. In 1875, Smith Fields was named postmaster of Croton. In 1880 he was a 57-year-old grocer in Delaware Township, and son Samuel was clerking in his store. In 1900, Smith Fields had retired. He was 76 years old, living with son Samuel’s family in Delaware Township, and Samuel was the grocery salesman. The list of postmasters above is vague about who was postmaster in 1900. Perhaps it was the elderly Smith, or perhaps his son Samuel. None of the census records identify either of these men as postmasters. I cannot say exactly when or where Smith Fields died, but someone of that name was recorded as being the same age as the Croton storekeeper, dying on Sept. 1, 1908 in Marion Township, Indiana. Who knows?

Grover Post Office (Headquarters)

It is hard to believe there was no post office here before December 14, 1887 when it ws established with Joseph Denson as postmaster. I am not yet certain, but I believe the post office began with the name Headquarters, but its name was changed to Grover in about 1900, in honor of President Grover Cleveland, a New Jersey native. President Cleveland had two terms of office, first from 1885 to 1889, and then from 1893 to 1897. The post office closed in 1905 and the name reverted to Headquarters. However, Delaware Township resident Edna Garbowski remembers some people calling it Grover as late as the 1930s. I only know of two postmasters at the Grover post office:

1887 Dec 14  Joseph Denson
1903             William Brewer, to 19051

Here is another instance where the list must be incomplete. Joseph Denson, a shoemaker born about 1812, died in 1892 in Delaware Township. That leaves ten years unaccounted for.

Locktown

Established on Nov. 8, 1856, and re-established on June 27, 1865, with John M. Chamberlin, postmaster and storekeeper. Notice of its opening in the Hunterdon Gazette stated that it was located in Locktown, Kingwood Township. This would have been somewhat north or west of the village itself. When John M. Chamberlin took over, he was apparently also located in Kingwood Township, as the census of 1870 locates him there. By 1880 Chamberlin was operating out of the store in the center of Locktown, in Delaware Township, now the home of Milt Smith. The post office was discontinued on July 30, 1906, with RFD service from Flemington. There were 3 post masters over a period of 50 years.

1856 Nov 8   John Bellis
1864 Apr 9    Post Office discontinued
1865 Jun 27   John M. Chamberlin2
1895 Aug 5    Sarah V. Chamberlin, until 1906

Oakdale

Established on November 24, 1856 at Bowne Station, William Barber, first postmaster. The station was known by several names, but the post office was officially Oakdale. According to E. T. Bush, the post office was relocated to Dilts Corner in 1895, keeping the name Oakdale. It was discontinued on Oct. 31, 1905, with RFD service provided from Stockton. The Oakdale post office had 11 postmasters over 49 years:

1856 Nov 24  William Barber
1865 Dec 5    Peter V. Hartpence
1879 Jun 16   Abner W. Muirhead
1881 Jul 7      William W. Hartpence
1889 Oct 31   Theodore H. Stout
1893 Sep 1     Anna R. Bowne
1894 Jan 31    Eva L. Suydam
1895              Moved to Dilts Corner
1898 Feb 27  Theodore H. Stout
1898 Feb 14   Norman Hartman
1899 May 6   C. S. Suydam
1902 Apr 18  William R. Stevenson

Prallsville

Established Dec. 31, 1817, Wm. L. Prall, son of John Prall Jr., postmaster. Prall ran the store in Prallsville with his cousin Jacob Lambert. They went bankrupt in 1819, and yet, according to this list, Prall was not replaced as postmaster until 1836, and then by his partner, Jacob Lambert. No doubt–there’s a story there. The post office was discontinued June 10, 1853 when it was relocated to Stockton. There were 3 postmasters over 36 years:

1817 Dec 31  William L. Prall
1836 Jul 1    Jacob Lambert
1837 Aug 11 William L. Hoppock3

Raven Rock (Saxtonville & “Bool’s Island”)

The post office at “Saxtonville” was opened in 1832, probably to serve people using the canal when it would open two years later. The post office was closed in 1837, but seems to have been reopened in 1841 when George W. Holcombe was named postmaster. In 1851, with the opening of Bel-Del RR, the post office was moved to “Bool’s Island,” although I do not have the name of the postmaster at that time. The post office at “Raven Rock” was established May 7, 1853, Mahlon H. Hoffman, postmaster. Some years the post office was located in the store, for instance, when George W. Robinson was postmaster. And other years it was located in the railroad station, Both station and post office were closed on June 30, 1936. The postmaster at that time was Earl F. Kerr, and the station master was Fred Moore. From the list below, you will see there was a heavy turnover of postmasters in the 1870s. You will also see that March was the favored month for installing a new postmaster.

Postmasters at Saxtonville (4 in 21 years):
1832 Feb 29   Peter H. Dilts, postmaster
1837 Sep 6     Carmelo F. Carnand4
1837 Oct 2     Post office discontinued
1841 Oct 4     Post office reopened, George W. Holcombe postmaster
1842 May 9   David Phillips, postmaster
1851               Post office closed, moved to “Bool’s Island”

Postmasters at Raven Rock (17 in 83 years):
1853 May 7    M. H. Hoffman
1859 Feb 5     Wesley Johnson
1863 Apr 13    Charles Heath
1867 Jul 16,    Aaron Barcroft
1871 Mar 13    William Sherman
1872 Apr 22   Till K. Fieman5
1875 Mar 29   Lorenzo S. Kerr
1877 Mar 11    Thomas McAloan
1878 Mar 17   Cortland Morris
1879 Mar 11    Wilson McClannen
1879 Mar 29   Dora L. Reading
1881 Mar 23   John Hutchinson
1882 Mar 6    George W. Robinson
1888 Apr 17   Henry Hardon
1889 Aug 18   George W. Robinson
1907 Mar 19   Charles G. Melick
1930 Feb 3     Louella E. Trimmer
1930 Aug 15   Earl F. Kerr

Rosemont

This post office got a late start. It originated in the Rosemont store in 1884 and was discontinued in 1906 with RFD service from Stockton. However, it was reopened in 1913, once again, in the store. Life was a little slow in Rosemont back then. When the store had to close around 1944, Ed Sherman moved the post office to his living room, which tells you something about the quantity of mail he had to deal with (not much). There it remained until 1977, when Irene Chipps found that the new businesses in the Cane Farm complex were creating too much mail for her living room to hold. The post office was relocated that year to Cane Farm. There have been 10 postmasters for 128 years, and since this post office is still in operation, there should be a few more.

1884 Apr 2    Ezekiel E. Bonham
1903 Apr 7    Lambert B. Mathews
1913 Jul 2      Charles Place
1923 May 5   Edward T. Sherwood
1955 Jan 31    Irene E. Chipps, acting postmaster
1955 Feb 28  Grace V. Ellis, acting postmaster6
1972 Jan 22   Irene E. Chipps, OIC; postmaster Jan. 22, 19727
1985 Aug 31  Patricia L. Rauschert, OIC; postmaster Dec. 21, 1985
1996 Aug 9   Mark E. Brunner, OIC
1997 Jun 7    Russell P. Orlando, postmaster, to the present date

Sand Brook

Established March 19, 1858, Reading Moore its first postmaster. (One of my sources stated that it began in 1848 with John A. Moore as postmaster, but I cannot verify that.) The post office was converted to a “rural station” on Dec. 31, 1959, to extend the rural routes of the Stockton post office. The Sand Brook rural station closed on May 21, 1970. A rural station was where mail was dropped off to be delivered by carriers; not a place where people could pick up their mail. There were 12 postmasters during the 101 years that it served as a post office:

1858 Mar 19   Reading Moore
1860 Mar 23   Caleb F. Wolverton
1878 Aug 26   Amy Wolverton
1884 Mar 17   Joseph S. Fauss
1886 Nov 19   George W. Higgins
1888 Dec 5     George W. Holcombe
1891 Mar 25   Andrew Bearder8
1901 Jan 14    Charles W. Moore
1902 Apr 18   Samuel F. Fauss
1911 Apr 17    Frank Johnson
1924 Oct 16   George Roemlin
1928 Nov 24  Frank Yasunas9

Sergeantsville

The granddaddy of all the township’s post offices–established 1827, first postmaster Jonas Thatcher. The story of how Skunktown became Sergeantsville when the post office was established has already been mentioned. Mr. Walker mistakenly states that the post office was opened on the northwest corner of the village. On the contrary, Thatcher’s store was located on property originally purchased in the mid-18th century by Amos Thatcher, on the southeast corner. Mr. Walker’s confusion no doubt comes from the fact that there have been stores on three of the four corners of ‘downtown’ Sergeantsville from a very early date.

When Amos Wilson owned the store in 1926, the postmaster was Newton V. Myers, who was also a schoolteacher. At some point, the post office was moved to the Venable Store, on the northwest corner, and later on it moved into the old butcher shop which is the current post office, one of only two remaining post offices in Delaware Township, out of the original eleven. There were 41 postmasters here in 185 years:

1827 Mar 15    Jonas Thatcher
1831 Feb 24    Henry H. Fisher
1834 Nov 24   Samuel Case
1838 Oct 26    Amos Hogeland
1840 Jul 23     John C. Fisher
1842 Jun 21    Amos Hogeland
1842 Dec 23   Samuel R. Smith
1845 Feb 5     Jeremiah Smith10
1845 Feb 17    John Quick
1850 Mar 5    Joseph W. Gano
1851 Apr 10    John C. Laban [Labaw?]
1854 Apr 29   Joseph W. Gano
1856 Apr 11    Charles H. Haines
1859 Jun 16    David Jackson
1862 Aug 21   Henry T. Quick
1864 Mar 23  John F. Shepherd
1866 Mar 22  George W. Mason
1868 May 5    David Jackson
1878 Feb 25   Harriet Jackson
1881 May 17   Asher B. Williamson
1885 Sep 16   George H. Fisher
1887 Oct 5     Joseph Lewis
1889 Apr 6    Asher B. Williamson
1893 Jul 12    Joseph G. Moore
1897 Jun 18   William L. Dobbins
1900 Jul 6     Isaac Haines
1906 Apr 12  Joseph G. Moore
1926 Nov 30  Newton V. Myers
1946 Feb 15   Lillian J. Myers
1958 Jul 24    Lawrence H. Emmons
1892 Nov 26  Anne C. Errico (post office in the old butcher shop)
1895 (about)  Thomas F. Freeman, OIC, date not known
1900 May 5    William D. Bennett, OIC
1991 Feb 2     Lorraine S. Jones, postmaster
2000 Mar 21  Joseph Pepe, OIC
2000 Apr 10   Richard Boehme, OIC
2000 Apr 22  Charles E. McGill, postmaster
2004 (about) Kim Krzywicki OIC
2005              Emilio Mercado, postmaster
2006 (about) Mark Henderson, OIC
2007              Patricia A. Greaves, postmaster, to the present date

Stockton Post Office

Originally located at Prallsville, it was re-established here on June 10, 1853, and has continued in operation since then, without interruption. There were 12 postmasters during the 44 years that Stockton was part of Delaware Township.

1853 Jun 10    Jeremiah Smith
1856 Oct 20   William W. Mettler
1859 Apr 7     Peter Dilts
1861 Jul 25     William C. Veghte
1866 Sep 7     Gershom Lambert
1869 Apr 12   Gabriel Wolverton
1881 Feb 7     Stephen B. Hill
1885 Apr 27   Daniel R. Sharp
1889 Apr 6     Harry D. Mason
1893 May 20  Jonathan M. Dilts
1897 May 14  William P. Mason
Erastus “Rasty” Rockafellar was a well-known mailman, who took on the Stockton RFD route in 1905. His home was in Sergeantsville.

Postmasters of the Female Persuasion

One of the benefits of making lists is that things become noticeable that might otherwise have been missed. For instance, after compiling the above lists, I saw that in 1878, two women were named postmasters, the first time this had happened in Delaware Township. They were Harriet Jackson for Sergeantsville and Amy Wolverton for Sand Brook.11 The next year, Dora L. Reading was named postmaster for Raven Rock. This may have been new for Delaware Township, but it was not new for the country as a whole. Women had been working as postmasters nearly as long as there has been a postal system, going back to the days of the Revolution and even earlier. The designation postmaster referred to either gender. Why there should suddenly be three women taking on the job in the 1870s appears to have been a cultural matter, instead of a formal policy. The late 1870s were difficult economic times and many people had moved away, not only from Delaware Township, but from the East Coast as a whole. As so often happens, when there is a slack, women will take it up.

The next post in this series will deal with political appointees. I’m really looking forward to researching and writing about this subject, especially the travails of Amos Hogeland, but it will have to wait for awhile since there are several articles that need to be finished first.

 

 

  1. I do not know the exact date when Brewer became postmaster, or if there was a postmaster between Denson and Brewer.
  2. John M. Chamberlin, storekeeper of Locktown, born about 1831 in Locktown. Married twice, both wives named Sarah. He died on July 24, 1895, and was succeeded in the position of postmaster by his surviving wife, Sarah Elizabeth Strimple.
  3. Hoppock bought the Prall complex from the heirs of John Prall Jr. (of which he was one) in 1833. I doubt that Hoppock remained postmaster until 1853, but do not know who succeeded him before the office was closed. Egbert T. Bush wrote that Jeremiah Smith was postmaster when the Prallsville post office was transferred to Stockton.
  4. I am not at all certain about this name; it comes from Mr.Walker’s book.
  5. I’m pretty sure that name is not right. There is no one with a name like that in the census index.
  6. Mrs. Ellis became postmaster May 15, 1956. Grace Ellis was the mother of Irene E. Chipps.
  7. OIC means officer in charge; it designates a temporary position. A postmaster is permanently assigned to their post office.
  8. The 1900 Census lists Margaret Holcombe, age 45, working as “Clerk Post office” in Sand Brook. She was boarding with the family of Charles Moore.
  9. I do not know whether there was a postmaster after Frank Yasunas. If there wasn’t, then he held the position for 30 years. Frank Yasunas died in 1975 at the age of 81.
  10. No doubt about, Jeremiah Smith got around. He was postmaster here in Sergeantsville, then he was doing the same job in Prallsville at the time it was closed. Then he served as the first postmaster of Stockton in 1853.
  11. Amy Wolverton is surprising. In the 1880 Census, she was 70 years old, living with her son-in-law John A. Moore, and despite her age, her occupation was “Post mistress.

{ 3 comments }

With the future of the American postal system in doubt, I thought I’d take a look at how it all began in New Jersey and here in Delaware Township.

I have written about our post offices before in “The Bridge,” Delaware Township’s newsletter,1 but my interest was reawakened when I realized that the Sergeantsville Post Office has been in existence for 185 years, something worth celebrating. Also, I recently acquired a book on the postal history of Hunterdon County, compiled by Jim Walker and available through the County’s Cultural and Heritage Commission.2 It reminded me that there is a lot more history in our post offices than we realize.

Before the Revolution, the best way to send a letter was to give it to someone who was going in the direction you wanted the letter to go, or to hire a special messenger. Letters exchanged between Nathaniel Saxton in Flemington and his father Charles living in Shamokin, PA in 1809, were sent by friends who were traveling between those two places. This was not always successful; sometimes those friends forgot to bring the letters or even lost them. But at least they knew who the intended recipient was, whether the handwriting was legible or not.

Address of a letter to Nathaniel Saxton, 1810

Addresses were written on the back of the letter. Envelopes were not used in the 18th century; in the 19th century, they were handmade until the 1840s. Letter writers of the 18th century would restrict their letter to one side of the paper, then fold it in such a way as to leave space for some sealing wax on one side, and the address on the other. Addresses were amazingly non-specific. A person’s name was usually followed with a general place, like their township, or even a neighboring township. Sometimes the writer would add the name of someone well-known who lived nearby. This system relied on good local knowledge for success. An impersonal postal system could never operate that way.

Postal systems needed post offices. The earliest post offices were at Burlington and Perth Amboy with a postal route running between them. The Trenton post office was established in the 1730’s. In 1769, a stage route on the Old York Road began carrying letters unofficially. All through the 18th century, residents of Hunterdon had to travel to Trenton, New Brunswick and even Philadelphia to get their mail. No wonder people relied on their traveling friends.

After the Revolution, the county’s population and prosperity increased, as did the number of post offices. By the early 1800s, there were seven post offices within the limits of present day Hunterdon County. They were:

Coryell’s Ferry 1802, Gershom Lambert postmaster
Flemington 1795, James Gregg postmaster
New Germantown 1795, Fredrick Bartles postmaster
New Hampton 1801, Joseph Wilson postmaster
Pittstown 1795, Benjamin Guild postmaster
Ringoes 1802, Nathan Price, postmaster
Van Syckle’s (Bethlehem Township) 1809, Elijah Vansyckle postmaster

After the War of 1812 had ended, there was a new wave of post offices.

Alexandria 1818, Lewis M. Prevost Jr. postmaster
Amwell 1814 (Lambertville, replacing Coryell’s Ferry), Capt. John Lambert postmaster
Bloomsbury (“Bloomsburg”) 1816, Henry Jones postmaster
Hunt’s Mills in Clinton, 1816, Ralph Hunt postmaster
Lebanon 1815, William Johnson postmaster
Milford 1817, William Housel postmaster
Perryville 1816, Charles Carhart postmaster
Prallsville 1817, William L. Prall postmaster
White House 1816, George W. Farley postmaster

By 1827, there were 26 post offices in Hunterdon County, including Sergeantsville’s, which was established that year. Henry H. Fisher Esq. got the appointment of postmaster for Jonas Thatcher, while the village of Skunktown was renamed Sergeantsville, after a local prominent family. The Thatchers were in fact just as prominent in the town, but since the new postmaster was a Thatcher, it was probably seen as a fair trade-off. Jonas Thatcher operated the post office in his store across the road from the tavern (now the township hall).

Postal rates were paid at the destination by the recipients rather than the senders. The cost was high, which discouraged people from picking up their mail. By 1825, postal rates were 6¢ for distances up to 30 miles, 10¢ for 30-80 miles, 12-½¢ for 80-150 miles, 18-¾¢ for 150-400 miles and anything over 400 miles was 25¢. Double and triple letters, which I presume to mean two or three pages, cost two or three times as much as single letters. Notices of unclaimed letters were posted in local newspapers listing the names of people who hadn’t picked up their mail. The Trenton Post Office listed many Hunterdon names well into the 19th century. The problem of unclaimed (and unpaid for) mail continued until 1847, when postage stamps began to be issued, requiring the letter senders to pay for the postage rather than the recipients.

The Postal Act of 1835 (the last year of Andrew Jackson’s administration), assigned the appointment of fourth class postmasters to the Postmaster General. This sounds reasonable, but it made it easier for political appointments to be made—that despicable ‘spoils system’ so roundly condemned by Jackson himself. For the next few decades, it is safe to assume that the appointment of postmasters was primarily political, a subject I hope to write about soon.

New stores and new post offices opened in Delaware Township villages from the 1820’s through 1850’s. It was logical for the local storekeeper to also serve as postmaster. The storekeeper was more a merchant than a clerk. He bought, sold and bartered with the local farmers, and arranged for transport of goods both in and out of the county. In small towns and villages, the local store carried almost every conceivable sort of goods. One of the new stores was established in Croton in 1845 by John S. Hockenbury, who was also postmaster. Locktown’s store was in operation by 1852, and its post office was established in 1856, making the name of “Locktown” official. Other post offices in local stores were at Headquarters, Sand Brook and Rosemont.

At mid-century, railroad stations became another useful location for a post office. In 1853, as a consequence of a railway station being opened at Centre Bridge, which was renamed Stockton, the Prallsville post office closed and reopened in the new station with the new name. A post office was established at Bowne Station in 1856 with William Barber postmaster; it was called “Oakdale” but locally known as Barber’s Station. The other train station with a post office was at Raven Rock, or “Bool’s Island,” where the post office was set up in 1853 and run by Mahlon H. Huffman.

In 1863, Congress authorized “free-carrier” mail service direct to the addressee, but only in urban areas. In Hunterdon, mail was carried to post offices by local carriers. The routes they traveled were called “star routes.” A “star route” never involved delivery of mail to residents. It was only for transporting mail between post offices. Even so, some star routes became road names, such as Old Croton Road, which used to be called Star Route A. In 1888, there was Star Mail Service between Sergeantsville and Kingwood. Augustus Gilbaugh, who lived near Sand Brook, carried mail by star route from Stockton to Flemington. He would travel by horse to Stockton, take on his mail and drop it off at Rosemont, Sergeantsville, Sand Brook and Flemington. Then he returned by the same route back to Stockton.

From the Kay & Smith book, I learned that in 1890, President Benjamin Harrison established by executive order the U. S. Board on Geographic Names. In their report, published in 1892, they also issued orders for future nomenclature. Those rules tell us something about how people were spelling in the 19th century. Here are some of the new rules for addresses:

– as far as possible, avoid the possessive form of names
– drop the h in burgh
– shorten borough to boro
– Centre should be spelled Center
– end the use of hyphens between names, like New-Jersey
– end the use of “C. H.” after the name of a county seat (C.H. meaning Court House)
– drop the words City or Town after the name of either
– end the use of diacritics or accents on letters
The strangest and silliest rule of all was that two-word names should be combined into one word, such as Raven Rock being changed to Ravenrock, which it was for several years.

Rural Free Delivery

RFD or Rural Free Delivery was established by Congressional action in 1896. In Hunterdon, the first routes ran from Flemington and Stockton. These were the largest post offices in the area. In 1900, the salary for ‘carriers of rural free delivery service’ was raised from $400 to $500 a year.

Rural free delivery made many local post offices obsolete. Dilts Corner was the first to close in 1905. In 1906, post offices in Rosemont and Locktown were discontinued (although Rosemont’s was later revived). The Croton post office closed in 1935 and the Raven Rock post office in 1936. It was observed at the time that closing the post offices took villages off the map. It certainly slowed things down in those places. In 1910, no one was listed in the census as a postmaster in Delaware Township. Only Farley S. Servis 35, was listed as “Mail Carrier, free delivery.”

Some local post offices did survive these changes, like the one at Sand Brook, which remained until it was changed to a star route post office in 1959. It continued there until 1970 when the store was closed. Today there are only two post offices in operation in Delaware Township, at Sergeantsville and Rosemont.

My next post will list all the post offices that operated in Delaware Township, along with their postmasters.

Corrections:

5/4/2012:  Fixed a typo; Raven Rock closed in 1936, not 1836. Thank you Lynn. 

  1.  I have forgotten exactly when the article was published (it was about 15 years ago). Archives for The Bridge can be found on the Township’s website, but they only go back to 2009. The Bridge has been published since at 1992 or earlier.
  2. Some of the names in Mr. Walker’s book are misspelled; probably by the sources that Mr. Walker relied on. However, Walker’s book is particularly valuable for the postal covers he has included, along with other images related to the postal service. Another book I have relied on over the years is New Jersey Postal History: The Post Offices and First Postmasters, 1776-1976 by John L. Kay and Chester M. Smith, Jr., published in 1977. Also, Hubert G. Schmidt’s Rural Hunterdon.

{ 2 comments }

The Bray Inheritance

by Marfy Goodspeed on April 16, 2012

in Delaware Township

This post is a follow-up to the previous one about the Bray family of Delaware Township, Andrew Bray and Sarah Rittenhouse. That post includes copies of the portraits of Andrew and Sarah Bray by William Bonnell.

Andrew Bray’s Later Life

In 1838, when Delaware Township was created out of old Amwell Township, there were several meetings at which the annoyed citizens of Amwell protested against the high-handedness of the state legislature, for creating the township without any notice to the residents. Curiously, Andrew Bray did not involve himself in these matters, nor did he volunteer to serve in the original committees of the new town government.

He also did not involve himself in real estate speculation, as so many prosperous people did at this time. One of the few deeds I found concerned David Howell of Amwell, who became bankrupt, and on May 22, 1841, assigned all his property to Andrew Bray to satisfy Howell’s 27 creditors. Howell owned a lot in Lambertville on Coryell St., and “3 dwelling houses.” Bray was obliged to sell this property and divide the proceeds among Howell’s creditors, himself being the greatest of them.1

On March 10, 1842, Andrew and Sarah’s son Daniel died at the age of 23. Surprisingly, there is no obituary for him in the Hunterdon Gazette, so the circumstances of his death remain a mystery. This left only Elisha Bray and younger brother Anderson. The family of Sarah’s father, Elisha Rittenhouse, also suffered considerable mortality. Several of his children died before reaching middle age, and at least one died as a child. Mortality was high in those days, for some families more than for others. By the time Elisha wrote his will in 1839, he only had three surviving children out of at least ten. He died on December 15, 1846, leaving to his daughter Sarah Bray six shares in the Centre Bridge Co. for her own use, exclusive of her husband. Rittenhouse had already transferred ownership of the nearly 250-acre farm to Sarah and her husband for half its market value.

And Now For A Little Diversion

History is complicated, and it is all too easy to find oneself distracted by tangents, which I am going to indulge in now, by describing an incident that I know practically nothing about. It took place in 1843, when Anderson Bray was only 16, and is interesting because it involves a terrifying crime, a home invasion.

The incident took place in Changewater, Warren County near Port Colden on the Morris Canal. An older man named John B. Parke, rumored to be wealthy, lived there with his sister, Mary Matilda Castner, her husband John Castner, their daughter Maria and two sons, and also a boy named Jesse Force. The Parke family originated in Hopewell Township in the late 17th century. One branch of the family settled in Delaware Township in the person of Ozias Parkes.

On May 1, 1843 John B. Parke and some members of his family were discovered brutally murdered by stabbing. The only survivors were the two Castner sons who had slept through the night. The suspects were Mary’s brother Peter W. Parke and Joseph Carter, Jr. Those two had fled and were later captured in Trenton. Anderson Bray was

“among the few persons living {in 1901} who saw the two men, Carter and Parks, on their way from Trenton to Belvidere, where they were hung {at the Warren County Court House} for the murder of the Castner family, in the early forties. They were guarded by a troop of twenty-four horsemen. They were also on horseback and hand-cuffed together. They made a short halt, at what was then known as Buchanan’s Tavern, on the Trenton road, three miles west of Flemington, now the residence of Asa Robbins.”2

This description was probably provided by Mr. Bray from his recollections. The trial drew as much attention for its time as the Lindbergh kidnapping trial did nearly 100 years later. Apparently, there is some reason to think at least one of the men might not have been guilty.3 The two men were buried in the Mansfield-Woodhouse Cemetery, not far from the burial place of the five victims.

Deaths of Andrew and Sarah Bray

The last real estate transaction I have found for Andrew Bray took place on April 1, 1848 and involved a lot of 20.75 acres purchased from John and Sarah Gordon for $1290.4 This lot was located on the southwest corner of Andrew Bray’s farm.

Andrew Bray died intestate at the age of 59 on March 27, 1849. I suppose he thought he had plenty of time to write a will. He must have been taken by surprise, either by illness or accident. The obituary in the Hunterdon Gazette does not enlighten us. It appeared in the issue of April 4, 1849: “DIED in Delaware township on the 20th ult., Andrew Bray.” Most obituaries of those days were alarmingly brief.

By the time of his death, Andrew Bray had only two surviving children, his sons Elisha R. and Anderson Bray, Elisha being 8 years older than Anderson. Andrew’s wife Sarah was only 52 when she became a widow, and her sons were 30 and 22 years old. They carried on with the farming and supported their mother for the rest of her long life.

Sarah Bray’s Will

Sarah Rittenhouse Bray wrote her will on July 24, 1875, being “advanced in years but of sound mind, memory and understanding.”5 To her son Elisha R. Bray, she gave “nothing, he having an abundance of property to maintain him as long as he lives.” This may reflect the fact that her other son Anderson Bray had to pay Elisha $5000 to buy out Elisha’s interest in the family farm.6

To Anderson Bray, who appears to have been Sarah’s favorite, she left the use of her estate, plus a few smaller lots, for his lifetime. Her estate consisted of “my right in the farm where I now live and the one-half interest in the moveable and personal property held by my son Anderson Bray and myself.” It is surprising that Sarah would limit her son’s ability to dispose of the property. She did consider the possibility that the bachelor Anderson might someday have a legal heir, in which case, said heir or heirs would inherit when they became 21.

She also considered the possibility that Anderson Bray would not have an heir. In that case, Sarah ordered that “$1000 of my estate [be given] to the Old School Baptist Church at Kingwood to be used towards the purchase of a parsonage for the use of said church the lot to be in the vacinity {sic} of Locktown and not more than two miles from their meeting house in this place the time of purchasing and the place of using the said sum of $1000 to be left to my Executor, and in case of his decease to be taken care of and used by the trustees of said church in the manner ordered above after the payment of the taxes and expenses thereon.” I will say more about this interesting bequest later on in this post.

Whatever remained of the estate would be “divided equally between the children of my brothers Robert Rittenhouse and Alanson Rittenhouse {both of whom had already died} and my sister Keturah Risler and Edward Priest share and share alike.” She named her nephew, Cyrus Risler, to be her executor, who was ordered to “take charge of my Estate after the decease of my son Anderson Bray.”

As for Edward Priest, he is a curious fellow. In the 1870 census, Edward Priest 19 and Sophiah Priest 42, were living with Anderson Bray 42 and his mother Sarah Bray 70, and also Elisha Bray, age 50. Edward was a farm laborer. The census does not tell us whether Sophiah was his mother or not. In 1880, Edward Priest had his own household and worked as a farmer. His widowed mother Henrietta, 52, who was born in Denmark, was living with him; his father was also born in Denmark. Immigrants from Denmark to Hunterdon County are pretty rare. It would be interesting to know more about this family, but it also appears from census records that Edward Priest left Hunterdon County before 1900.

The Later Years of Sarah Bray

In March 1876, Anderson Bray partnered with a distant cousin, Richard M. Rittenhouse, to purchase a farm of 43.35 acres on Pine Hill Road from the estate of Stacy Risler deceased.7 The same year, in October, a regrettable incident took place.8 It concerned a hunting party that included John Williamson, “employed by Joseph Smith, of Delaware Township,” who

“went gunning on the farm of Anderson Bray, about 2 miles north of Sergeantsville. John was standing on a stump, resting his arm on the gun, when it slipped and discharged its contents, blowing off part of the left arm. The other load went off and hit him in the abdomen. He was taken to his father’s residence where he died in a few hours. He was about 20 years old and much respected by all who knew him.”

John Williamson was the son of Emley Williamson (1829-1909) and Celinda Snyder (1836-1918).

In the census of 1880, taken on June 16th, Anderson Bray was listed as age 53, a farmer, living with his mother Sarah age 84. Also in the household was Anderson’s brother Elisha 58, “at home,” which means he had no known occupation. There was a housekeeper, since Sarah was too old for the arduous work of maintaining a 19th-century household; her name was Kate Roberts, age 48, and her daughter Kate, age 13, was at school. The school was not the old Risler school, which was no longer in use; most likely it was the school in the village of Locktown. There was also a boarder named Charles C. Smith, age 10, who was not at school.

I cannot help but wonder if that Charles C. Smith, listed in the 1880 census in the Bray household, might have been related to Jacob B. Smith and Isaac Smith, to whom Anderson Bray and Richard M. Rittenhouse sold their lot on Pine Hill Road for $1626 on April 4, 1882. This lot was not at all connected with the Bray farm on Upper Creek Road, or with the estate of Sarah Bray.9

Sarah Bray’s Inventory

Sarah Bray died on February 3, 1882 at the age of 85. Her obituary in the Hunterdon County Democrat was not as brief as her husband’s was.

”The funeral of Mrs. Sarah Bray, widow of Andrew Bray, dec., and daughter of Elisha Rittenhouse, took place on Tuesday at Locktown, She had died on 4 Feb. 1882. She had been a faithful and consistent member of the Old School Baptist Church for many years and was highly respected by all who knew her. She was about 83 years old and had died at the home of her son, Anderson Bray, in Delaware Tp.”

The inventory for Sarah’s estate is a curious one. The appraisers, Richard M. Rittenhouse and Abel Webster, agreed with the executor, Cyrus Risler, that it was not possible to separate out Sarah’s one-third interest in the real estate of her deceased husband. But they thought it “be just and right to take the one third part” of the personal estate of Andrew Bray dec’d, which was valued at $4,128.94 when his inventory was taken on April 5, 1849. This amounted to $1,376.31, to which they added interest from 1849 to Feb 5, 1882 at 5%, which came to $2,259.42, which added to the “principal sum” resulted in a total of $3,635.73. Anderson Bray acknowledged that he had the amount of $3635.73 in hand and would dispose of it as his mother’s will directed.10

This must have been a burden for Anderson Bray. I have not seen any record to explain how he disposed of the money, although it would be worth checking to see if an account was submitted by Sarah Bray’s executor, Cyrus Risler.

The Parsonage House

Despite the wishes of Sarah Bray, no such parsonage was ever built for the Old School Baptist Church in Locktown. There is a house, known as the Parsonage House, across the road from the current Presbyterian Church, corner of Locktown-Sergeantsville Road and Locktown-Flemington Road. But that was built for the Locktown Christian Church in 1876, before Sarah Bray died.

Elder Aaron B. Francis of the Old School Baptist Church, probably 1870s

The pastor of the Old School Baptist Church, when Sarah wrote her will in 1875, was Elder Aaron Bise Francis, a Confederate veteran from Virginia. He certainly must have had a beneficial influence on his congregants if Sarah Bray wished to provide him with a house. (In a future post I will explain why Elder Francis was so well received. It is quite a story.) But Elder Francis already had a house on Upper Creek Road, which Francis himself built in 1871. It appears in the 1873 Beers Atlas at that location, and has been owned John and Judy Schoenherr for many years. Elder Francis remained there during the length of his pastorship which came to an end a year before the death of Sarah Bray in 1882.

Judy Schoenherr’s son Ian Schoenherr did some research on Elder Francis and discovered that Francis had written a paragraph in his memoir about his stay in Hunterdon County. It is worth quoting here:

“On the 15th of September 1870, I with my wife went to live in Hunterdon Co. New Jersey. I had been called to the pastorate of the Kingwood Old School Baptist Church located at Locktown, a Small village in Hunterdon Co. seven miles west of Flemington the county-seat. In the following year 1871, I bought a piece of land eighteen acres, about half  mile south of Locktown, and built a house into which we moved the first of November of that year. . . . During our residence at that place our eldest child died of Scarlet Fever March 10, 1873 . . . . During my pastorate of the Kingwood Church, I baptized quite a number, but the deaths fully equaled the additions.”11

After Elder Francis left Hunterdon County, the house he had lived in was owned by Adam Ruppell, a German immigrant, born July 1829, who was not associated with the Locktown Baptist Church. The pastor who succeeded Elder Francis in 1882 was Balis Bundy of Otsego, New York. I do not know where he lived. The answer may be found in the County Clerk’s Office.

We are left to wonder why a parsonage was never built, and what happened to the money allotted for it. I must leave these questions unanswered for now.

The Last Years of Anderson Bray

Interestingly, about 7 years after Sarah Bray’s death, Anderson Bray married a much younger woman. She was Amy Snyder (1860-after 1920), daughter of Samuel B. Snyder and Matilda Brewer.12 Anderson was about 62 years old, but Amy Snyder was only 28. She had a 14-year-old daughter, Ida (born November 1875), and an infant daughter, Margaret (born in May 1881). The father of these children is unknown. Perhaps this marriage was an act of generosity on Bray’s part.

Elisha R. Bray, Anderson’s brother, died in October 1891, at the age of 73, unmarried. Oddly enough, despite his mother’s contention that he had more than sufficient property to live on, there is no estate recorded for him, at least in the Index of Hunterdon County Estates.

In 1900, Anderson Bray and his family were listed in the census for Delaware Township. He was still a farmer, even though he was 73 years old, born in December 1826. His wife Amy, born March 1860, was 40 years old. They had 3 children, all of them alive. Living with them was daughter Sarah age 8, born September 1891, and daughter Maggie Snyder 19, born May 1881, single. By this time, Ida or Ada Snyder had married Mahlon Corson of Delaware Township.

Anderson Bray wrote his will on January 14, 1905. Since he only had a life estate in his mother’s share of the farm, which was to be inherited by his heirs, he was limited in what he could bequeath. He made earnest efforts to see that his wife Amy was well-provided for, stating that if their daughter Sarah were to die without issue, then her rights in his estate should pass to his wife Amy. He also provided that if both daughter Sarah and wife Amy were to die, then the estate should go equally to Ida Corson, wife of Mahlon Corson, and to Maggie Higgins, wife of James Higgins, the daughters of Amy Snyder Bray before her marriage to Anderson Bray. And he named Mahlon Corson executor along with Amy Bray.

By 1910, when Anderson Bray was 83 years old, he had given up farming. He was living “on his own income” with his wife Amy M., age 56, having been married for 21 years. Between them, they had three children, all of them still alive, including daughter Sarah, age 19. As part of the household, James C. Higgins 29 was listed as a farmer, wife Margaret 30, married 8 years but no children, and James’ mother Margaret Higgins 63, widow. James Higgins must have been farming for his father-in-law. His own father, William Higgins, had died sometime between 1900 and 1910.

Anderson Bray died on June 6, 1913 at the age of 86. Like his mother, he had remained true to the Old School Baptist Church. Its publication, Signs of the Times, printed an obituary for Anderson Bray, written by D. M. Vail.13 As was customary in religious publications, little was said of Bray’s life, but quite a bit about how peacefully and resignedly he died. Vail wrote:

“He bad been in very poor health for many years, but was in bed only about a week before he passed away. Although he suffered greatly at times, yet he bore his suffering with patience. He always had some kind word of comfort for his family. . .  Mr. Bray was born on the farm where he died. I was personally acquainted with Mr. Bray, and am well satisfied that he was a subject of God’s saving grace. I have spoken in his house several times, and he always expressed complete satisfaction with what I said. . . . He leaves a lonely widow and two daughters,14 with friends, to mourn, but not without hope. . . . He was buried in Sandy Ridge Cemetery.”

As the wills of both Sarah and Anderson Bray had declared, Anderson’s only child Sarah inherited his estate. Shortly after the death of her father, Sarah Bray married Clarence Pyatt. Their first child, Albert S. Pyatt, was born about 1915. In the 1920 Delaware Township census, Anderson Bray’s widow Amy was 65, living with Sarah and Clarence Pyatt on the farm located on the “Locktown-Covered Bridge Road,” as Upper Creek Road was known at that time. Four of their five children had been born, including twins Robert and Ruth in 1819. Listed next to them was George C. Pyatt, brother of Clarence, and his wife and daughter. Clarence and George were sons of Albert Pyatt and wife Henrietta, and grandsons of King Pyatt and Elizabeth Bellis.

It is at this point that I shall leave the Bray family and the Bray farm on Upper Creek Road. There is always more to be said, but this post is long enough.

Corrections:

5/2/2012:  Ian Schoenherr pointed out to me that the original date of 1901 that I had given for the carte d’visite of Elder Aaron B. Francis was incorrect, that by 1901 Elder Frances was a much older man. The picture probably dates to the time when Elder Francis was living in Locktown.

  1. Deed 75-406. I have no information, at this time, linking this David Howell to the early Howell family of Amwell/Delaware Township. All deeds require some kind of “consideration” or payment to be legally valid; in this case, Andrew Bray paid David Howell 50 cents.
  2. Buchanan’s Tavern was at the intersection of Routes 523 and 579. Quote from The Democrat-Advertiser, March 28, 1901.
  3. See History of Sussex and Warren Counties by James P. Snell, pg 499; also The Sussex Register, 1897, Ancient Local History, pg. 50; and Find-A-Grave.com. Also see from The Library Company of Philadelphia, Protest of Peter W. Parke, who was executed on Friday, Aug. 22d, 1845, in which he declares his innocence to the last moment of his life, also his opinion concerning the Changewater murder, with a brief examination of the character and testimony of some of the principal witnesses for the state. Published for the benefit of his widow and three orphan children. Also Report of Cases Argued and Determined in the N. J. Supreme Court, 1847-1848, pg. 310, Furman v. Parke, in which David Parke sued to have the reward for discovery of the perpetrators given to him. Many thanks to Ian Schoenherr for discovering these sources.
  4. Deed 91-461. The price amounted to $62 per acre.
  5. Hunterdon Co. Wills, Book 13 pg. 673.
  6. This was done on January 24, 1857; see E.T. Bush’s article on the Bray family.
  7. Deed not recorded; sale referred to in Deed 224-188.
  8. It was reported in The Democrat-Advertiser on November 1, 1901.
  9. It appears that Charles C. Smith was the son of Mahlon D. Smith and Sarah H. Bryan, although I have very little information on that family, and no indication of a connection between Mahlon D. Smith, and Jacob or Isaac Smith.
  10. Hunterdon Co. Inventories, 19-150.
  11. A copy of the Francis memoir was sent to Ian Schoenherr by a Francis descendant, Roger Vandegrift.
  12. The marriage was not listed in Deats’ Hunterdon County Marriages, nor in the Minute Book of the Kingwood Baptist Church.
  13. Signs of the Times, vol. 81 1913, pg. 414, provided by Ian Schoenherr.
  14. I cannot explain why Mr. Vail wrote that only two daughters survived Anderson Bray. All three of them appeared in the 1920 census.

{ 0 comments }

Andrew Bray and Sarah Rittenhouse

by Marfy Goodspeed on April 9, 2012

in Delaware Township

And The Risler School

First, Gen. Daniel Bray

I am not ready to write at length about Gen. Daniel Bray. But in order to write about his son Andrew, something must be said of the father.

Daniel Bray is one of the most famous residents of Hunterdon County, thanks to his participation in the marvelous escape of 1776, when Washington succeeded in getting what remained of his army across the Delaware River, and preventing the British army, hot on his heels, from following him into Pennsylvania. Daniel Bray was in charge of collecting the boats that were used to transport Washington’s army, and then of hiding them from the British.

After the war, Daniel Bray, like Cincinnatus, went back to being a Hunterdon County farmer, on his homestead farm in Kingwood Township. He and his wife Mary Wolverton already had four children by the end of the war. Afterwards they had ten more, Andrew Bray being the 7th out of 14 children. Only ten of the Bray children reached adulthood.

The Early Life of Andrew Bray

I have no evidence for this, but it is safe to assume that Andrew spent his youth working on his father’s farm, and attending the Baptist church, whose services alternated between Baptistown and Locktown. It was probably at church that Andrew met his future wife, Sarah, the daughter of Elisha Rittenhouse and Isabel Miller. Sarah was the fourth child of ten born to Elisha and Isabel Rittenhouse. She was born on May 14, 1796, when her parents were living on the mill property on Old Mill Road. Andrew and Sarah were married in the Baptist church on June 15, 1815, when Andrew was 25 and Sarah was 19.

The fact that Andrew and Sarah married after the end of the War of 1812 made me wonder whether Andrew Bray was a participant in that war, carrying on his father’s military legacy. But he is not listed in Stryker’s Records of Officers and Men of New Jersey in the Wars, 1791-1815, and there is no record that he applied for a pension. In fact, as far as I can tell, none of his brothers participated either. Perhaps the family was less than supportive of this controversial war.1

Andrew and Sarah Bray’s first child, Sylvanus Jackson Bray, was born on October 27, 1815, only four months after his parents’ wedding. The choice of name shows that the Brays were duly impressed by the victory of Gen. Andrew Jackson over the British at New Orleans. It would be interesting to know whether Andrew Bray sympathized with the Federalists who had opposed the war but then got swept up in the euphoria of Jackson’s victory. Sadly, Sylvanus Jackson Bray did not live beyond his 11th birthday; he died on February 16, 1827.

Daniel Bray died in 1819 at the age of 67. He had written his will in 1813, in which he ordered lands to be sold and the profits divided among his children, including son Andrew. By this time, Andrew Bray was probably living on the extensive property owned by his father-in-law, Elisha Rittenhouse.2 The Rittenhouse lands originally ran along the Wickecheoke from Locktown down to Old Mill Road. In 1801, Elisha Rittenhouse exchanged that property for a large farm owned by Thomas Opdycke, which was located on Upper Creek Road south of Old Mill Road. That farm was described by Egbert T. Bush in his article The Anderson Bray Farm.

After Thomas Opdycke died in 1805, Elisha Rittenhouse was named one of the Commissioners to divide his real estate to satisfy his creditors. But Rittenhouse was one of those creditors, and he wanted his old family farm and mill back. (Mr. Bush also wrote about this property, calling it Holcombe’s Mill.) Since Rittenhouse could not bid on the property, being a commissioner, he arranged for his son-in-law Andrew to bid when it was put up for public auction in March 1818; then on August 20, 1818, Andrew conveyed it back to his father-in-law. Sounds a little shady, but this was quite common at the time. In most cases, the two sales took place within a few days, but in this case there was a gap of five months, suggesting that Andrew Bray might have tried his hand at milling, and decided against it. This second sale took place a month before the birth of Andrew and Sarah’s twin sons, Daniel and Elisha R. Bray, born on September 5, 1818.

Once Elisha Rittenhouse had taken possession of his father’s old farm and mill, he probably began construction of the handsome stone house that stands on the north side of Old Mill Road. It was built in the federal style, and must have been admired by his fellow congregants of the Baptist church, for Elisha Rittenhouse was chosen to supervise construction of a new church at Locktown in 1819. Many of the architectural details of the church are similar to those in the house on Old Mill Road.

Old School Baptist Church at Locktown, before the stucco was removed

On February 28, 1821, Andrew and Sarah Bray had a daughter Matilda. She died at the age of 12 on May 30, 1833, probably from scarlet fever, a common killer of adolescents in the early 19th century.

On September 1, 1821, Elisha Rittenhouse made a sort of settlement with his son-in-law. He conveyed the 248-acre farm once owned by Thomas Opdycke to Andrew and Sarah Bray for $3100, which was considered half of its actual market value, and in exchange, Andrew and Sarah agreed not to make any claims against the rest of the estate of Elisha Rittenhouse. So, the property later owned by Chet Huntley and Douglas Knight officially became the Bray Farm as of September 1, 1821.

The Portraits

Andrew Bray, portrait by William Bonnell, 1825

In 1825, Andrew Bray was 35 years old, Sarah was 28, and John Quincy Adams had just been sworn in as president. It was then that Andrew and Sarah decided to have their portraits painted by Hunterdon County’s only accomplished portrait painter, William Bonnell of Clinton. This idea may have come from Andrew’s mother Elizabeth Woolverton Bray, who also had her portrait painted by Bonnell.

Sarah Rittenhouse Bray, portrait by William Bonnell, 1825

I particularly like these portraits for the way they show how Hunterdon County people looked during this time in history, particularly those who were prosperous enough to hire a portrait painter. The fashions they wore did not change much between 1825 and 1838, when Delaware Township was created.3

The portraits could be found hanging on the walls of the Bray home for many decades, until 1969, when they were sold at public auction, following the death of Sarah Bray Pyatt. The purchasers were Mr. and Mrs. Terry Eld of Milford, NJ. According to a news story about the sale, Eld claimed to be a descendant of Gen. Daniel Bray’s brother Andrew. But Gen. Bray did not have a brother named Andrew. Mr. Eld may have been thinking of the Andrew Bray who was  born in England in 1713, died in Lebanon Township in 1789, and was a fervent patriot during the Revolution. Presumably the portraits are still owned by members of the Eld family. The portrait of Andrew Bray’s mother can be seen at the Hunterdon County Historical Society.

A year after the portraits were painted, Andrew and Sarah Bray had their fifth and last child, Anderson Bray, born on December 5, 1826.

A School for the Rittenhouse Neighborhood

On October 7, 1829, Andrew Bray sold a half-acre lot out of his plantation to his father-in-law. It is not at all clear why Elisha Rittenhouse wanted to acquire the lot, but a later deed of 1837 explains what Andrew Bray’s interest in it was. That later deed, in which Elisha Rittenhouse sold the half-acre plus a lot of 34 acres to John T. Risler, his son-in-law, states that the “log schoolhouse” on the half-acre lot was to be excepted from the sale to Risler, “with the Exception of the said Andrew Bray shall hereafter insist that a school be occasionally kept in said log schoolhouse for the instruction of his own children and others of the neighborhood,” and that Elisha Rittenhouse would be given notice “a reasonable time before the said school is to be opened.” In 1829, when Andrew Bray sold this lot, his twins Daniel and Elisha were 11 years old, and Matilda was 8. Anderson was only 3, so he probably did not begin attending the school until about 1834.4

In 1906, Jonathan M. Hoppock wrote an article about this school titled “The Oldest School in Hunterdon.” I suspect this is not really true, although it may have been the oldest school still standing in 1906. Mr. Hoppock’s article is important for the detailed description is gives of the log schoolhouse, and for the photograph of the school that accompanied the article. And it is fascinating because Hoppock was acquainted with Anderson Bray, who by 1906 was quite elderly, yet still able to remember attending this very ancient school when its teacher was Abraham Chatman.

Clint Wilson also wrote about the school in the Lambertville Beacon in 1965, but his was basically a rewrite (without attribution) of Hoppock’s earlier article. Wilson more prudently titled his article “The First School In Delaware Township.” I plan to publish many of Clint Wilson’s articles in the future because he was an authority on schools, storekeeping and baseball in Delaware Township. On the subject of the Risler school, however, Mr. Hoppock’s article will suffice.

Mr. Hoppock believed that the school was built about 1780 on land that was owned by the Rittenhouses. Elisha Rittenhouse was born in 1768, so he would have been the right age to attend this school, as would his three younger sisters. Mr. Hoppock wrote that the school was located about an eighth of a mile west of the old mill on Old Mill Road. The deed of 1837 suggests that it was on the north side of the road, just west of the intersection with Upper Creek Road. Apparently the name “Risler School” was used by residents of the area in 1906, but it should rightly be called the Rittenhouse school, since it was probably built by Peter Rittenhouse for his children.

An Old Road Name

In 1837, Elisha Rittenhouse sold a lot of 21 acres to Andrew Bray for about $33.50 per acre.5 The lot was described as bordering the road from “Frenchtown to Sergeantsville.” Perhaps you, gentle reader, are not familiar with a road by that name. It’s no wonder—there never was a road officially named the Frenchtown-Sergeantsville Road. Descriptions like this are misleading if you think they are describing one particular road. In fact, you need to look at a map to see what is the most likely route from Frenchtown to Sergeantsville, eliminating of course all modern roads. Since Upper Creek Road does take you in the direction of Sergeantsville if you are coming from Frenchtown, it is safe to assume that is what was meant.

A future post will discuss Andrew Bray’s later life and the estate that passed to the widow Sarah Bray, and then to their son Anderson Bray, and then to Anderson Bray’s daughter Sarah Bray Pyatt.

  1. Andrew, Daniel and James Bray were listed in the Kingwood militia for 1792, but this was too early for the sons of Daniel Bray. Andrew would have been only three years old.
  2. I could not find any land transactions by this Andrew prior to 1818; there were several for an older Andrew Bray of Lebanon Township.
  3. Apologies for the poor quality of these pictures; they are photographs of photocopies, included in a dissertation by Anne Kennedy in 2010 on the life and work of William Bonnell. It can be found at the Hunterdon Co. Historical Society.
  4. I have not found that deed of 1829 that was referenced in the deed of 1837, and expect that it was never recorded.
  5. Deed 70-115.

{ 0 comments }

by Jonathan M. Hoppock
published in The Democrat Advertiser, January 25, 1906

This article was written by J. M. Hoppock. I have added corrections and additions in footnotes. Mr. Hoppock’s very specific description of this building, which was demolished long ago, is invaluable to students of the township’s history and early architecture.

The Risler School, photo from the Democrat-Advertiser, 1906

The old structure above shown has, perhaps, the rare distinction of being the oldest building still standing in the County, if not in the State, that was built for—and used—as a school house for a long number of years.1 It is located on the west side and near the Wickecheoche {sic} creek, about one mile southwest of Locktown, on the southwest corner of the farm at present owned by John T. Risler.2

It is a log structure, built after the manner of old-time buildings during the early settlement of this and other parts of the county in colonial days. The logs used in its construction are flattened at the sides by being hewn with the axe, notched at the corners and firmly held together by wooden pins. The interstices are filled with clay. At the northwest corner is a chimney with an ample fire place, showing that when used as a school room it was heated in this manner. It is twenty feet square, the door fronting the south with two small windows, one on the south and the other on the west side. The beams overhead are unhewn logs, notched and pinned into the topmost log of the frame work, seven feet above the floor of the room, the bark still remaining upon them, and are as sound as when first placed there by the hardy old pioneers of the long ago3

In what year it was built is somewhat a matter of conjecture, as no records can be found to prove the exact date of its erection, but from what can be gleaned concerning its history it is evident that it was built more than one hundred and twenty-five years ago.

Cyrus Risler and Anderson Bray, two of the oldest life-long citizens of this locality, both of whom are widely and favorably known, informed the writer that they both during their first school days were pupils in this school, Mr. Risler in 1834, seventy-two years ago, Mr. Bray nearly seventy-five years ago.4 Mr. Bray also informed us that the teacher at the time he attended was Abraham Chatman. No school has been kept in the old building since that time.

Mrs. E. Fisher, living in the same vicinity, states that she remembers her mother, Lucinda (Gordon) Reading, deceased, say that in this house was where she first attended school at the age of about eight years. As Mrs. Fisher’s mother was born in 1817, it is evident that she passed her first school days here more than eighty years ago.5

Daniel Heath, an uncle of ex-County Superintendent E. M. Heath, frequently told Cyrus and John T. Risler, both of whom are now living, that in this old house, at a very early age, he was a pupil, and spoke of others—then nearly grown to manhood—who attended at the same time. As Daniel Heath died in 1878 at the advanced age of nearly 87 years, it establishes the fact that it was used for school purposes as long ago as the time above given—one hundred and twenty-five years 6

Another verification of the foregoing statements is that, according to the records kept of the present adjacent school districts, giving the time and at what place other school houses were built, it is shown that (with probably two exceptions) no other buildings were erected for school purposes in this part of the township longer than one hundred years ago.

The first {school} house in the Locktown district, at present including that immediate part of Kingwood and Delaware on the north and east of the building here shown, was built in 1804.7 The first trustees were William Lair, Captain John Heath and Richard Heath. The first teacher was William Heath, who taught for about seven years, and was followed by Adam Williamson, who taught for about the same length of time. Readings, on the west, built in 1796. First trustees Samuel Wolverton, John Reading and John Hoffman.8 The few meagre records still to be found of Sergeants, on the south, show that a school house was built in that district in about the year 1800.9

From what can be shown by extant deeds, and also well authenticated traditional facts relating to the early settlements in this region, it is evident numerous settlements were made here more than one hundred and fifty years ago, a long time prior at which places named, houses were built for school purposes, and doubtless here, as in other parts of the State, the old settlers after having secured a title for their homes, erected their log cabins and cleared the land, their next great care was to erect a school building for the benefit of the generations that would follow, and doubtless by mutual efforts—and with their own hands—this “temple of knowledge’ was reared; still standing a mute reminder of the happenings of the long ago—a connecting link between the present and pre-Revolutionary times.

The farm upon which the old house stands, as before stated belonging to John T. Risler, is a part of the original tract purchased by William Rittenhouse in 1734. This tract was situated west of the Wickecheoche creek, and extended westward to the road leading from Rosemont to Kingwood.10 Portions of this were sold shortly afterward to the Greens, Gordons, Rousers and others. The staunch old stone mansion, built by Richard Green in 1743, and now occupied by E. L. Higgins, situated about one mile southwest of the old school house, was erected on the farm included within this tract, and was purchased by Green from Rittenhouse in 1742.11

On the east of this tract the Williamsons settled about the same time.12 This place is at present owned by Frank P. Williamson. Northeast from this, and still closer to the school house, is situated the old Gordon homestead, settled about one hundred and fifty years ago, now occupied by G. W. Mount.13 On the south adjoining the farm of John T. Risler, is located the farm now owned by Anderson Bray, who was born and has continuously lived on this place for nearly eighty years. His father, Andrew Bray, owned it before him, and his maternal grandfather, Elisha Rittenhouse, previous to this bought the place of Gideon Rouser, and built the handsome old mansion now standing upon it.14

The old stone dwelling built by Rouser, once standing on the site of the present structure, was torn down, and the stones used in building the walls underneath the same. Elisha Rittenhouse purchased and built here previous to the year 1800, and as Rouser is said to have occupied this place for a long time, it clearly proves that the first settlement here must have been made nearly one hundred and fifty years ago.15

About one-eighth of a mile east of the school house, on the opposite side of the creek, is still standing the old mill, known for miles around as “The old Rittenhouse mill.” This mill probably was built about the year 1780.16

Charles Wilson Opdyke, son of former Mayor George Opdyke, of New York city, in his history of the Opdyke family, claims that “Thomas Opdyke received from his father by deed, in 1775, 267 acres of land in Amwell (Delaware) township, and in the year 1790 purchased at sheriff sale the property on which this mill stands, and in paying for it used in part payment 107 acres of the land given him by his father, John Opdyke, to satisfy the claim of a dower of the wife of Benjamin Tyson.”17

As it is a well-known fact that another mill, or mills, once stood on the same premises, a short distance away from the site of the one now standing and that Peter Rittenhouse, prior to the Tyson-Opdyke purchase,18 was the owner of the property, the inference can be safely drawn that settlements were made here at least one hundred and forty-five years ago. The foundation of the house, a short distance from the mill, once occupied by Peter Rittenhouse, is still to be seen.19

In addition to these names given, many other families, long before the outbreak of the Revolution, within a radius of two miles from the old house, purchased land and made this part of West Jersey their homes, notably among the number were the Heaths, Suttons, Lairs, Myres and others, whose children doubtless received their schooling in this roughly built old cabin. The old building is rapidly falling into decay. The teachers (or masters) who once ruled here, not with a “mailed hand encased within a velvet glove,” but heeded the saying of the wise man of Israel: “Spare the rod and spoil the child,” have long since gone from earth, and the few remaining pupils living are men and women of nearly four score years of age.

Old methods of teaching have given way to the new, but if the same rigid discipline in the schools of today prevailed as in days of yore, perhaps the standard of morality would be elevated, and coming man be made a better citizen, if not a more polished scholar.20

For many of the facts here stated we are indebted to Anderson Bray, Cyrus Risler and John T. Risler and family for their courtesy.

Of the two other school houses referred to, the existence of which is well nigh forgotten, the one stood on what is known as the Ferry Road, two or more miles east, and the other nearly the same distance south of the old house shown in the cut on first page, on what was once known as “The Salter Place,” now owned by John W. Fisher.21 These three houses were probably built at about the same time. Of the last mentioned, tradition alone can be depended upon to bring it to memory.

John Hoppock, born in 1767, and grandfather of the writer, frequently told him that in his boyhood days he attended school in the old house on the Ferry road, and that his instructor was an English sea captain, a man advanced in years, and who, in consequence, had abandoned a sea-fairing life, and had become so reduced in circumstances that he resorted to teaching as a means of gaining a livelihood.22

18th century penmanship from John Hoppock's teacher

He was spoken of as a man of much knowledge, a deep mathematician, and a skilled penman. A specimen of his penmanship is shown above.23 The copy of the original is at present at the office of “The Democrat-Advertiser,” where it may be seen. The old manuscript is bound with rough leather, and on the first page is written: “John Hoppock—his cyphering book, 1789.”

This penmanship of the long past, on paper with a coarse, rough surface (before steel or fountain pens were even dreamed of) with a pen made from a goose quill, certainly compares favorably with the penmanship of the present day. It would be a satisfaction to know if any school work (outside of this old manuscript) done in any school in the State one hundred and seventeen years ago could at present be found.24

The old Captain taught at the Risler school first described, and wound up his professional career at the house on the Salter place.25 The late Green Sergeant, Esq., who lived for more than eighty years at Sergeant’s Mills, near where this last named house was located, often told the writer that this quaint old school house was built of logs and thatched with straw, and that the old Captain, while teaching here, sickened and died. On being prepared for burial, twenty gold English guineas were found in a girdle around his person. The authorities took charge of this and gave the old gentleman a decent burial.

 

  1. I do not think Mr. Hoppock had certain proof that this school was in fact the oldest school in Hunterdon County. It may have been the oldest schoolhouse left standing in 1906.
  2. The Risler farm was located in Delaware Township on Block 10 lot 6, north of Old Mill Road.
  3. This is an excellent description of the type of log structure that was commonly built in southern Hunterdon County in the 18th century. Today there is only one known log structure remaining, which I hope to write about someday. Fortunately, the owners allowed Richard Veit, a well-known New Jersey archeologist, to study the building while it was being restored, and he documented its construction in a bulletin of the Archaeological Society of New Jersey.
  4. Cyrus Risler (1828-1921) was the grandson of Elisha Rittenhouse, who probably attended the school when it was built in 1780.
  5. Lucinda Gordon (1817-1897), the daughter of John Gordon and Sarah Fulper, married John Woolverton Reading (1812-1898) on September 21, 1839. Her daughter, Sarah Elizabeth, born 1852, married Charles T. Fisher (1851-1893) on November 25, 1873.
  6. Daniel Heath was born in 1791, so if he attended the school when he was 9, then it was in use in 1800. He was the son of Richard Heath (1759-1849) and Catharine Rittenhouse (1762-1830), and married to Rebecca Sherman (1796-1879). Their children were born about 1815-1820, and are likely to have also attended the Risler school.
  7. This Locktown school was built on a small lot leased to the trustees by Daniel Rittenhouse. It was located in Locktown, just south of the bridge over the Wickecheoke Creek, on the west side of the road. This later became the church lot. Since this article is about the Risler school, I will avoid going into detail about the other schools that Mr. Hoppock mentions here.
  8. The “Readings” school still stands on the north side of Route 604, not far from the old Wescott farm and the much older Reading family cemetery.
  9. “Sergeants” school also still stands, although it is not the original building of 1800. The surviving building was constructed about 1830 and is located at the intersection of Reading Road and Route 604. It is now a private residence.
  10. Not exactly. The Hammond Map of proprietary tracts shows that William Rittenhouse owned two lots of 177 and 241 acres which he purchased from Ralph Brock. These lots were located on both the east and west sides of the Wickecheoke, ending at Locktown on the north. What Hoppock is describing is the huge Biddle tract that ran from the Rittenhouse Locktown land west to Route 519. William Rittenhouse owned another tract of land running from Rosemont south along Route 519 and west of the Reading tract.
  11. Exactly where Richard Green lived is very difficult to say, because the property he owned was so extensive. He did buy land from Wm. Rittenhouse in 1742, but that property was near Locktown, not near Rosemont. On the other hand, his only son Samuel, would have inherited the home plantation after his father Richard died intestate in 1794, and Samuel lived near Rosemont. The jury is out at the moment.
  12. William Williamson bought his plantation in 1735 and added to it in 1742. The plantation straddled Pavlica Road.
  13. I assume Mr. Hoppock is referring to the home of Philip Gordon, who lived along Pine Hill Road from about 1793 until he moved to Ohio in 1839.
  14. That is, Anderson Bray’s maternal grandfather; but Elisha Rittenhouse did not buy the land from Gideon Rouser. It was inherited by Gideon Rouser’s son Jacob, and after Jacob died, it was sold to Thomas Opdycke, who sold it to Elisha Rittenhouse in 1801. See my article on Andrew Bray, and his wife, the daughter of Elisha Rittenhouse.
  15. Hoppock has omitted the fact that the heirs of Gideon Rouser’s son Jacob sold the farm in 1793 to Thomas Opdycke, who then sold it to Elisha Rittenhouse in 1801. If the original Rouser house was replaced by another one, it was most likely built by Thomas Opdycke, not Elisha Rittenhouse. See Mr. Bush’s article on the Bray Farm.
  16. Actually, there was a sawmill on this property in 1767 when William Rittenhouse bequeathed it to his son Peter Rittenhouse. There was also a mill here in 1791 when Peter Rittenhouse bequeathed it to his son Elisha. Egbert T. Bush wrote about this in his article Holcombe’s Mill.
  17. I hardly know where to begin with this misunderstanding. Hoppock is referring to land near Headquarters, which was never associated with the property on Old Mill Road. For a description of the actual land swap, please see my footnote to Mr. Bush’s article on the Bray Farm, as well as these articles about Headquarters: The Magic of Myths and Tyson’s Mill at Headquarters, among others.
  18. The Tyson name should only be linked to Headquarters, nowhere else.
  19. I would love to know where that foundation was located. Since Hoppock was writing over 100 years ago, it seem unlikely that the foundation can any longer be found. And I wish to emphasize again that Benjamin Tyson had nothing to do with this property. Thomas Opdycke bought it in 1801 from Elisha Rittenhouse.
  20. Hm.This shows how perennial is the feeling that schools just aren’t what they used to be.
  21. This would be on the Sergeantsville-Rosemont Road west of the Covered Bridge, on the Harriet Fisher farm. As for the location of the old school on Ferry Road, I haven’t a clue. No school is indicated there on the Cornell Map of 1851. Mr. Hoppock seems to be indicating a location on Ferry Road between Biser and Mezaros Roads.
  22. Oh dear. “Resorted to teaching? The teaching profession has long been held in low regard.
  23. Titled “Subtraction.” Too bad Mr. Hoppock’s grandfather did not recall the name of this memorable character.
  24. And also whether this particular specimen has been archived at the Hunterdon County Historical Society, or allowed to go the way of so many other old documents.
  25. This was the James Salter farm on Rosemont-Sergeantsville Road.

{ 2 comments }

Anderson Bray Farm and The Pyatt Family

by Marfy Goodspeed on March 31, 2012

in Historians Revisited

Mr. Bush Traces Ownership of Place Long Owned
by Bray Descendants
The Bray Family Portraits

by Egbert T. Bush, Stockton, N.J.
published by the Hunterdon Co. Democrat, April 19, 1934

The following article was written by Mr. Bush about a farm many people think of as the Chet Huntley farm or the Douglas Knight farm. I have added footnotes to flesh out the story. 

The Andrew Bray House

This old farm and vicinity have been for several years a matter of much interest to me. The farm was known to have been in the Bray family for a long time, but whom or by whom it had been conveyed to them was not known. Careful search, supplemented by no little inquiry, has thrown much light upon the subject. It is found that by deed dated Sept. 1, 1821, Elisha Rittenhouse and Isabella his wife, in consideration of $3,100, conveyed to Andrew Bray, a son of General Daniel Bray, “All that tract or parcel of land formerly the property of Thomas Opdycke, deceased, and by him conveyed to the said Elisha Rittenhouse . . . October 20, 1801.”

“Beginning at a rock where formerly a sweet maple stood, corner to John Smith’s land and also corner to what was formerly called Montgomerie’s tract; thence along said Smith’s line South 86(?) degrees West, 60 chains to a stone in said line; thence North 4 degrees West, 10.65 chains to a hickory saplin for a corner, also corner to lands formerly Daniel Howell’s; thence North 21 degrees West, 18 chains to a stone corner;  thence North 4 degrees West, 83 (?) chains to a corner of other lands of said Rittenhouse (formerly Bellises), on the North side of the run; thence North 67 degrees East, 6.80 chains; thence down said run, North 2 degrees East, 6.40 chains, thence North 50 degrees East, 10.50 chains to a hickory for a corner in the road; thence South 70 degrees East 2.40 chains (?);  thence South 4 degrees East 20 chains to a stone;  thence North 86 degrees East, 33.50 chains to the middle of the Witchecheoak Creek;  thence down the same, South 35 degrees East 10 chains to the old line;  thence along the same South 4 degrees East 26.90 chains to the place of Beginning, containing 248 acres, be the same, more or less.1

This long description, tho abbreviated by us of figures and partly clarified by a little punctuation—yet a trifle obscure in spite of all—has been found advisable for checking the work.

Recital From Deeds

The deed by Thomas Opdyke, Oct. 20, 1801, says:

“Whereas Jacob Rouser stood lawfully seized in fee of a certain Tract of Land or plantation, situate in the Township of Amwell, aforesaid, containing by estimation 288 acres, being so seized thereof, the said Jacob Rouser died intestate on or about the 17th day of April, 1789; and Whereas administration of the goods of the said Jacob Rouser was, on the sixth day of May 1789, granted unto Mary Rouser and Jonathan Woolverton; and Whereas Peter Fox did afterwards become joint Administrator with said Mary Rouser and Jonathan Woolverton by his marriage with the said Mary Rouser; and Whereas the said Administrators obtained of the Judges of the Orphans Court, May 2, 1792 . . . by virtue whereof . . . Thomas Opdycke became the highest bidder for said plantation, whereupon the said plantation was cryed off and sold to the said Thomas Opdycke; Now therefore this Indenture Witnesseth that the said Administrators, in consideration of 1,333 Federal Dollars and 33 cents, did convey the said plantation to the said Thomas Opdycke, the 21st day of May, 1793”.2

A deed by Elisha Rittenhouse and Mabel, his wife, and Sarah Rittenhouse (widow of Peter Rittenhouse) to Thomas Opdycke, has this preamble:

“Whereas William Rittenhouse the elder had surveyed and located 240 acres of Land lying in the Township of Amwell on the Wickechaoak Creek (recorded in the Surveyor General’s office in Burlington, in Book A page 293). The said William Rittenhouse being so seized thereof, did, by deed dated August 3, 1760, convey 100 acres of the above tract to his son Peter Rittenhouse and Whereas the said William Rittenhouse by his last will and testament did devise the residue of said Tract of 240 acres to his aforesaid son Peter Rittenhouse and the said Peter Rittenhouse, by his last will and testament, bearing date of the 22nd day of August, 1791, did devise the above mentioned tract of Land to his son Elisha Rittenhouse, party of the first part to these presents;

“Now This Indenture Witnesseth that the said . . ., in consideration of the exchange of Lands to the full value of the Lands hereby intended to be conveyed, by Deed bearing even date with this Deed, by which said Thomas Opdycke conveyed a farm or plantation in full compensation for the Lands hereby intended to be conveyed.”

This may appear hardly necessary to our purpose; yet it clearly shows to whom these lands belonged in the early days.3

The Rittenhouse Will

The will of Elisha Rittenhouse dated April 29, 1839, and probated Dec. 28, 1846, has the following: “I give to my wife Isabella Rittenhouse the use of the homestead farm containing about 100 acres, during her natural life, Excepting the mills thereon erected and also as much of the land of said tract as will secure to the purchaser of the Mills the water power required for their use and benefit.” Evidently the Holcombe Mills of later date. “To my daughter Sarah, wife of Andrew Bray, to them I conveyed land several years ago, making as I conceive ample provision for them.4 I shall therefore add nothing to their legacy except six shares of my Centre Bridge stock, and this I give exclusively to my daughter Sarah, notwithstanding her marriage.” By this he evidently meant nothing against her husband, but wanted this stock to furnish Sarah with “pin money,” or money over which no one else should have any control.5

This will also says: “My son Allison Rittenhouse departed this life leaving six children, three of each sex. To them I hereby give and bequeath the farm or tract of land whereon they now live, situate in the township of Delaware,6 and also twelve shares of my stock in the Centre Bridge crossing the Delaware River. To my daughter Keturah, wife of John Risler, I give the farm whereon they now live, containing about 100 acres, to the said Keturah and John Risler and to their heirs forever”.7

This John Risler (generally written John T. Risler) was made executor of the will. He was the father of the late Cyrus Risler and of the John Risler who owned the farm adjoining that of Cyrus Risler, until he sold it to John Jungbludt, July 5, 1921: “Being the same which Keturah Risler conveyed to the said John Risler, April 5, 1870.”

Ancient Trees Felled

We find that by deed dated March 31, 1866, Anderson Bray and Sarah Bray conveyed 66 ½ acres of land to William L. Hoppock, Samuel C. Hoppock and John Finney, for the snug sum of $6,000. Also that the same tract was by the same parties conveyed to Anderson Bray April 22, 1867, in consideration of $1,000. This looks like a great and sudden depreciation in value. And such was the case. Any old citizen knowing the activities of the first purchasers—especially of John Finney—may readily recall or imagine the different aspect presented by that tract of land when it came into their possession, from that which it presented when they sold it back. The fine old oaks and graceful hickories all gone. Not one majestic beech or towering poplar remaining. Nothing but sickly saplings, perhaps broken and disfigured, struggling for life among stumps and briers and piles of blackening brush—the ghastly remains of last year’s grandeur and glory.8

Neither of these deeds has any recital. Whether it all came from the original tract or not is hard to tell without careful drafting. Another noticeable thing about them is that Sarah Bray is not designated as “widow.” And what is still more puzzling is that she is not mentioned in the later deed.9

By deed dated Jan. 24, 1857, Elisha R. Bray, in consideration of $5,000, released to Anderson Bray and Sarah Bray, “All his rights and share in the property of Andrew Bray, deceased, in all lands and personal {property} of all kinds, held and enjoyed by the said Sarah Bray, Elisha Bray and Anderson Bray as joint proprietors.” The deed speaks of the real estate as about 300 acres, with another lot adjoining. Elisha R. was a bachelor living with his mother and his brother Anderson.

The will of Sarah (Rittenhouse) Bray, probated Feb. 17, 1882, has this provision: “To my son Anderson Bray I give the use of the balance of my estate as long as he lives, and if he leaves legal issue to the time of his decease, it shall belong to them at the age of 21 years, both principal and interest remaining”.10

Anderson Bray Marries

Up to that time, Anderson Bray had been a bachelor, living with his mother and brother. Subsequently he married Amy, daughter of Britton Snyder (always known as “Brit Snyder”). They had but one child, a daughter Sarah R., who under the provision of her grandmother’s will, came into possession of the property at the age of twenty-one.11 She married Clarence A. Pyatt, a great grandson of that well-remembered Dr. James Pyatt, who came from the vicinity of Piscataway in 1805, and began to practice medicine at Croton. In 1808 he married Sarah, daughter of Jeremiah and Sarah (Rittenhouse) King, on her 20th birthday. In 1758  [Jeremiah] King had bought a tract of land near Quakertown, a part of the original 500-acre tract owned by John Stevenson. In 1776 he sold this and soon after bought the large tract of land above Croton, where they lived at the time of their daughter’s marriage to Dr. Pyatt. In 1778 King’s first wife died. In 1779 he married Sarah, daughter of Moses and Mary Rittenhouse.

The Pyatt Family

Dr. Pyatt’s activities, professional and otherwise, covered a period of about 60 years. Clarence Pyatt is a son of Albert and grandson of King Pyatt, who was burned to death in 1895, when the attractive old house known as the “Upper Boarshead Tavern” was destroyed by fire. A grewsome sight, indeed, was the search for the few remaining pieces of charred bone representing all that remained of the good old man.12

Clarence A. and Sarah (Bray) Pyatt have five children; namely, Albert S., Dorothy E., Robert, Ruth and Evelyn. While yet in high school, from which she graduated at the age of 15, Dorothy wrote for the D.A.R. a very creditable article on the Life and Services of Gen. Daniel Bray. The organization thought so well of the effort that both it and its author received appropriate recognition.

In these five youngsters is mingled the blood of at least four well-known families that mingled long ago: the Brays and the Rittenhouses on one side, and the Kings and the Pyatts on the other. In fact, we find the widely-distributed Rittenhouse family coming in on both sides.

The Bray Portraits

Unfortunately, there are no photographs of the elder Brays. A fine oil painting of Andrew Bray and one of his wife Sarah adorn one hall in the homestead dwelling. These were painted by William Bonnell and by him signed and dated, April 20, 1825. Who that old-time artist was is not known, but his works live after him.13

This Pyatt family, however, hold two photographs that were submitted to me some months ago for identification. They are fine pictures of Dr. James Pyatt and his wife Sarah. They are highly prized, and would doubtless be of interest to many people who have knowledge of this old couple, once so prominent in the affairs of their community.14

Dr. James Pyatt 1784-1864

Sarah King Pyatt, 1788-1874

[Note: The faces of Dr. and Mrs. Pyatt speak volumes about the challenges of their lives, but also reflect the state of photographic technology of the time. They had to hold still for many minutes while the exposure was being taken. Try staring into a camera, keeping perfectly still, for five minutes. You'd look somber too.]

Letters of administration of the estate of Dr. Pyatt were granted to his son King, Nov. 24, 1864. Sarah King Pyatt died in Flemington, April 9, 1874. The well-kept Bray records show:

Andrew Bray, born Dec. 12, 1789, married Sarah Rittenhouse Jan. 15, 1815, died March 27, 1849;
Sarah Rittenhouse Bray, born May 14, 1796, died Feb. 3, 1882; and that their children were:
Sylvanus Jackson Bray, born Oct. 27, 1815, died Feb. 16, 1827;
Daniel Bray, born Sept. 5, 1818, died March 10, 1842;
Elisha Bray, born Sept. 5, 1818, died Oct. …, 1891;
Anderson Bray, born Dec. 5, 1826, died June 6, 1913.15

 The nucleus of Andrew Bray’s extensive holdings, long known as the Anderson Bray Farm, has been at various times expanded or contracted. The latest change was made by Sarah R. and Clarence A. Pyatt and Amy Bray, Oct. 1, 1932, when they conveyed 75 acres from the western part thereof, to Henry E. Pardoc and Tiza Pardoc, his wife, leaving the present area at about 100 acres.

Buildings Very Old

Unfortunately, there are no dates or records to show when the older buildings were erected. In 1852 a new barn was built, as a stone in the foundation shows. The timbers from the old barn were used in another new structure, now serving as a cow barn; they remain hard, sound and massive as ever. The house is certainly old, but it has no distinctive features by which to fix even the approximate time of its erection.16

On these historic places the sturdy old farmers worked and prospered, tho the soil would never justify what was laconically said of rich Western land: “Tickle it with a hoe, and it laughs with a harvest.” But hard work and good management forced this soil at least to smile pleasantly, in spite of sternness. Here as elsewhere, what the soil did for the farmer depended very much upon what the farmer did for the soil. And it may be that this old law of compensation has never been repealed, however much some of us may have disregarded it. Be that as it may, this old Bray farm is still the home of thrifty people, fighting their way thru discouraging conditions, much as their ancestors were doing long ago.

 

  1. The bordering owners, ‘Montgomeries’ tract, and ‘lands formerly Daniel Howell,’ indicate that  this deed uses a much older description than 1801.
  2. This is probably more verbiage than is really necessary. The aforementioned Jacob Rouser inherited the farm from his father, Rev. Gideon Rouser, whose parents, Martinus Rouser/Rauscher and Maria Salome, emigrated from Holland or Germany around 1710 and baptized their children in the Dutch Reformed Church at Hackensack, NJ. When the Dunkard Church was being established in Amwell Township in the 1730s, Gideon Rouser was present, assisting the pastor, Rev. Bechleshammer. I have not yet discovered who Rev. Rouser married, but the marriage must have taken place about 1733 because his first child, Martin, was born in 1734. Gideon had at least 6 children, and Jacob was probably the third. Jacob’s sister Elizabeth (born 25 Sep 1748, died 22 Jul 1819) married Daniel Moore of Amwell in 1774, and had 11 children. His sister Hannah (born about 1755) married James Jones of Amwell. The other 3 children of Gideon Rouser disappeared from Amwell Township.
  3. The description of land once owned by William Rittenhouse is pertinent to another Bush article, concerning Holcombe’s Mill on Old Mill Road. But that was not the same property as the one Bush is discussing here.
  4. This was the tract of 248 acres conveyed to Andrew and Sarah Bray in 1821. The property was sold at “half its real value” for $3100, with the understanding that it would remove any other claim that Andrew and Sarah Bray might have against the estate of Elisha Rittenhouse.
  5. Bush has no way of knowing if this was merely ‘pin money’ or was meant to protect his daughter from profligate spending by her husband, as was usually the case. Andrew Bray, however, appears to have avoided falling into debt during his life, so perhaps in this case, Bush was right. As for Centre Bridge stock, it is hard to know how much value it had by this time. The bridge had been in operation since 1814. It was built by a private company which sold stock and collected tolls. See my article on Nathaniel Saxton’s efforts to get a bridge built at Saxtonville.
  6. This farm was located on Whiskey Lane.
  7. The Risler farm was on Upper Creek Road, north of Old Mill Road.
  8. This is a very eloquent description of the appearance of a field that has been clear-cut. Many people think of this as a 20th-century practice, but it was extensively used in the 19th century, either by people like John Finney, who ran a lumber factory in Stockton, in partnership with William L. Hoppock, or by farmers themselves, who even cleared trees in the hedgerows. By the end of the 19th century, the landscape was nearly bare, providing extensive views but little shelter for humans, animals or birds. Mr. Bush appears from his writings to have had an abiding love for the great old trees he remembered from his youth, before the days of clear-cutting.
  9. Andrew Bray died on 27 March 1849, so his wife Sarah was a widow for almost 20 years and was 70 years old when this transaction took place. The fact that the land was sold back to her son Anderson, and not to her, may simply be her way of conveying to her son her rights in the farm.  Otherwise, she would have had to record a quit claim deed, as son Elisha did in 1857. Or Anderson would have had to wait until his mother died, since he was her heir.
  10. So Sarah was leaving the balance of the 300 acres to Anderson for his life, which would amount to about 234 acres, unless other parcels had been sold off before this time. Sarah could not convey a life tenure to the lot that had been sold to Finney & Hoppock, but she still had rights in the remainder of the farm. As for Elisha R. Bray, he remained unmarried his whole life. When he conveyed his rights in the farm to his brother, he received in exchange the handsome sum of $5000. How Anderson Bray managed to pay that amount is an interesting question. Elisha R. Bray died in October 1891, at the age of 73.
  11. Anderson Bray was 63 years old when he married in 1889. Why he waited so long is a mystery. His wife Amy was born in March 1860, making her 29 years old when she married. She already had a daughter Margaret, born in 1881 to a father unknown.
  12. “Grewsome” was the way ‘gruesome’ was spelled in Mr. Bush’s day. The old schoolmaster would know. As for King Pyatt, it was certainly a tragedy for him and his family, but also for Delaware Township heritage that the old “Upper Boarshead Tavern” was burned down. It would have been an important landmark. The “Lower Boarshead,” which was the original tavern, was located on the Raritan Township side of Route 579, opposite the intersection with Boarshead Road. It too has been demolished. So today it is hard to imagine how active and important this area was in the 18th and 19th centuries.
  13. A study has been done on William Bonnell’s life and work. I will describe it and show his paintings of the Brays in a subsequent post.
  14. The portraits were not part of Mr. Bush’s article. I am delighted that descendants of King and Sarah Pyatt have made these photographs available to me. They are a little faint, so I have adjusted the images with Photoshop.
  15. There was another child, Matilda, born 28 Feb 1821, died age 12 on 30 May 1833. I do not know why her record was not included.
  16. According to a later resident, there was a stone in the fireplace that was transferred to a walkway. It read “GR 1752.” The GR must have stood for Gideon Rouser (see footnote 2), and may indicate either the date of construction for the earliest part of the house, or of an improvement.

{ 4 comments }

Obituary for Egbert Trimmer Bush

by Marfy Goodspeed on March 26, 2012

in Historians Revisited

Egbert T. Bush, for More Than 40 Years a Schoolmaster, Dies

Hunterdon County Democrat, November 25, 1937

 This obituary was (almost certainly) written by D. Howard Moreau, one-time owner of the Hunterdon County Democrat, and long-time friend and admirer of Egbert T Bush. Moreau helped persuade Mr. Bush to write his many historical articles for the Democrat. Because I am republishing the Bush articles with commentary, I thought it would be wise to publish his obituary now rather than wait until I had published all of his articles. I might not live that long; so far I’ve only published 11 (out of about 198). Another reason for publishing the obituary now is that, while researching Bush’s article on the Anderson Bray farm, I came upon photographs of Mr. Bush in the Bush Papers at the Hunterdon County Historical Society. I found them fascinating, and needed the proper vehicle for publishing them. Unfortunately, none of the photographs had dates. Nor did they have names, and I made the mistake of assuming that the oldest face was Mr. Bush in his 80s. But after looking through copies of his articles, I realized that the picture was of Elias L. Dalrymple, and have therefore removed it from the post. The remaining three photographs appear to be Mr. Bush in his 50s, 60s, 70s. Personally, I think he looked best (and most dapper) when he was in his 70s, demonstrating the truth of his poem, “When Leaves Grow Grey.”

 

Egbert T. Bush, known by thousands of residents of Hunterdon County, many of whom were his pupils during the forty years he taught in the public schools of this county, died at the home of his daughter in Center Bridge, Pa., Sunday afternoon, Nov. 21, 1937, after an illness of a week.

Mr. Bush had been in failing health for a number of years but in spite of his advanced age of 89, retained his characteristic keen interest in affairs. Death was caused by a complication of ailments brought on by his advanced age.

Perhaps no schoolmaster in the history of Hunterdon County made his influence more widely felt or held the respect and esteem of a larger number of pupils than did Egbert T. Bush. Largely self-educated, he was nevertheless a man of high scholarly attainment as was evidence by his writings, his interest in historical, educational and scientific subjects and his service on important bodies where his advice and counsel were always valued highly.

Born Near Croton

Egbert Trimmer Bush was born June 21, 1848 near Croton. Once, commenting upon his early education, he said: “I grew up working, going to school when there was nothing else to do.” By sheer persistence, however, he did attain more schooling than the average country boy of his time, studying Latin, Greek, scientific subjects and mathematics, trudging off to Flemington when the day’s work was done to report to his teachers.

At the age of 20, Mr. Bush qualified for a Third-grade County Teacher’s Certificate; seven years later he earned a First-grade County Certificate and in 1885 he received the First-grade State Teacher’s Certificate. By 1916, he had taught forty years in the schools of Hunterdon County, holding contracts at various times for the schools at Croton, Larison’s Corner, Klinesville, Cherryville, Mount Pleasant and Van Dolah’s, all one-room typical country schools. Later he was principal at Frenchtown, at Stockton and for a number of years, of Reading Academy, Flemington.

Mr. Bush in 1871 married Sarah Eleanor Willson. Mrs. Bush died 51 years later, May 19, 1922, at Stockton, where they had taken up residence ten years before. Mr. Bush then went to live with his daughter, Mrs. Evelyn B. Johnson, of Center Bridge, where he died. Besides Mrs. Johnson, he leaves one son, Percy W. Bush of Sandy Ridge; a grandson, David Johnson of Center Bridge; a granddaughter Mrs. Henry Hartman of Center Bridge, and two brothers, Sidney M. Bush of Locktown and J. Wesley Bush of Lambertville.

Author of Several Books

Egbert T. Bush, probably early 1900s

While Mr. Bush, from boyhood enjoyed writing, it was not until the present century that he attained fame in the literary world.1  His first book, in 1904, was entitled “In the Grip of the Expert.” It was a novel. In 1910 he won the New York Herald prize for the best story written by an American school teacher. The title was “Dockerty.” A book of poems published in 1916 by Samuel French & Company, of Boston, bore the title “When Leaves Grow Old.” It was dedicated “To My Good Friend, Dr. George N. Best, whose skill, philosophy and kindly touches have smoothed over so many of the rough places of life.” Dr. Best will be remembered as the late Rosemont physician and botanist.

Mr. Bush was the author of many newspaper articles, scores of which were published in [the] Hunterdon County Democrat.2  Most of them dealt with Hunterdon County history, particularly the history of forgotten or nearly forgotten communities and seats of local industry in earlier days. In 1906 the North American Review published one of his articles, “A Rural View of Rural Free Delivery.” It was a reply to an attack on the R. F. D. system by General Hawkins, who was bitterly opposed to mail service for country residents. The article was syndicated and republished, being credited with having a wide influence in the fight to adopt R. F. D. service.

Authority on Agriculture

In addition to teaching, Mr. Bush was a farmer and an authority on agriculture, especially agricultural history of Hunterdon County. For a number of years he edited “Hunterdon County Board of Agriculture News.” From 1886 to 1892 he operated a farm at Quakertown and from 1892 to 1912 he owned and managed the farm where his son resides at Sandy Ridge.

Egbert T Bush, c.1910-1915

From 1884 to 1895 Mr. Bush was a member of the County Board of Examiners for teachers and from 1917 to 1928 he served on the Board of Visitors of the New Jersey State College of Agriculture, a position in which he took a very active interest. When he was dropped from the Board, Rutgers College presented him with a beautifully embossed citation, setting forth the appreciation of the institution for his services. The citation was inscribed and in a red leather cover, hand tooled and hand illuminated. This Mr. Bush treasured highly. It was signed by Dr. John M. Thomas, Rutgers president, and Dr. Jacob G. Lipman, dean of the College of Agriculture.

Characteristic of the man is a little note of appreciation penned to the editor of the Democrat in March, 1928, after an editorial had appeared protesting his removal from the Board of Visitors. He said:

I have read with much interest both the report and your editorial in this week’s Democrat. Your kind words concerning myself and my work impress upon me the truth of a remark which I have often made when things did not go as hoped or expected, namely:  ‘The loser is sometimes the winner.’ Your kindness makes me feel very much that way over this matter.
With sincere thanks,
Yours Truly,
Egbert T. Bush

Skilled in Mathematics

Mr. Bush was skilled in practical mathematics as well as in the science of the subject. When neighbors had puzzling problems it was to Mr. Bush they would look for the solutions. In fact he was the friend and adviser to a large clientele and at his office in Colligan’s Hotel, Stockton, in his later years he was to be found, as he put it, “busy with writing and reading and various things which folks find for me to do.” He did title searching, was a notary public and helped friends with minor legal problems and detail work that they placed in his care. Frequently he came to Flemington, in the course of his title searching work and here retained a wide acquaintance.

To a biographer Mr. Bush once remarked: “My life must appear drab when put on paper” but, he added, “Simple and unspectacular as that life has been, I have not found it drab, and do not find it so as the sun goes down in life’s west.”

Egbert T. Bush in the 1920s

The closing poem in his volume “When Leaves Grow Gray” expressed his philosophy of life. It follows:

“’Tis written so, old men grow gray;
But why should age be dark and sad?
By the same law old leaves look gay,
And closing days are doubly glad.
Let man so learn! dispensing cheer
From gathered joys of days long past,
May he grow happier year by year,
Like theirs, his brightest days his last.”

Mr. Bush was not a member of any church, but he took an active interest in the Old Quaker Meeting House at Quakertown, always being among those to attend the annual service and to supply this paper with an account of the meeting.

At the time of his death, Mr. Bush was still serving as secretary of the Delaware Township Vigilant Society, an organization with which he was long affiliated.

Mr. Bush held membership in many fraternal, agricultural and scientific organizations, including the following:

Orpheus Lodge No. 137, F. & A. M., Stockton; Lackatong Lodge No. 114, I. O. O. F., Quakertown; Capoolong Encampment Lodge No. 32, Quakertown; Sergeantsville Grange No. 101, Sergeantsville; Hunterdon County Pomona Grange, State Grange; Stockton Lodge No. 140, K. of P., now defunct; American Association for the advancement of Science, National Geographic Society and The Hunterdon County Historical Society.

Funeral services will be held Wednesday afternoon, Nov. 24, at 1:30 o’clock, from the home of his daughter at Center Bridge. Burial will be in Sandy Ridge Cemetery under direction of C. Walton Green of Rosemont, assisted by Poulson & Van Hise.

Correction, 4/11/12: I had mistakenly thought Mr. Bush had published 300 articles, but now find there were only 198, plus a letter or two. Only 198.

  1. It is ironic that when Bush took his examination for a teacher’s certificate in 1868 he scored highest in math and lowest (a 70) in writing. Even more surprising is that Bush always tested worse in writing than any other subject. I learned this from Bush’s article “1879 Copy Of Old Democrat Revives Memories Of Many Old Timers” published on Sept. 9, 1937.
  2. As far as I can tell, about 198 articles written by Mr. Bush were published in the Hunterdon Co. Democrat. Barbara Charles, who did a magnificent job of compiling those articles and indexing them, seems to agree. A copy of her work can be seen at the Hunterdon Co. Historical Society.

{ 0 comments }

What It Takes To Raise A Village, Part 2

by Marfy Goodspeed on March 16, 2012

in Delaware Township

19th Century Villages in Delaware Township

This is another long post; it is the rest of a talk I gave in 1997 on Delaware Township villages (part one can be read here). Part two focuses on the villages in the 19th and early 20th centuries. There is far more to say about them, which I will attempt to do in future posts. Currently I have been researching the history of Raven Rock, which you can read about here and here.

Barber’s Station/Oak Dale/Oakdale/Bowne or Bowne Station

Was this a village or wasn’t it? Does a train station make a village? Does a post office? Not in this case. Bowne Station must be categorized as a neighborhood, not a village.

In 1854, the Flemington Railroad Company succeeded in opening a line connecting Flemington to Lambertville. It appears that a station was set up here at that time or soon afterwards, named Barber’s Station, after William Barber, a prominent resident who lived close by. Why put a station here? Bowne Station Road (it was not called that at the time) crosses the Alexauken Creek at this point, and that may be the only reason. The area was sparsely populated. Dr. John Bowne and William Barber owned large farms here, but there was no cluster of houses or shops. Dr. Bowne was a very influential person, who practiced medicine from 1795 until his death in 1857 at the age of 90. His son, Joseph Gardner Bowne (1804-1888) was elected to the State Senate in 1868.

A post office was set up here in 1856, and the postal service took the liberty of naming it “Oak Dale,” a pretty Victorian name that had no connection with the place. Some might have called it Oak Dale Post Office at Barber’s Station. It seems apparent from the Hunterdon Co. Gazette that the names Barber’s Station, Bowne Station, Bowne and Oak Dale were used interchangeably during the period following the Civil War. On January 1, 1883, the railroad company changed the station name from Barber’s Station to Bowne Station. Perhaps the intention was to have the station reflect the name that was commonly used by the residents of the area.

In 1895, the post office was moved to Dilts Corner, and the name Oakdale went with it. No real village services were located here other than the station and post office, and when they both closed, the village, if it was a village, lost its identity entirely, and is now no more than a neighborhood on the township map.

 Brookville

View of Brookville, early 20th century, looking north

This is a fascinating little place. It’s hard to believe, but in the 19th century, it was a hub of activity, thanks to Hiram Deats. Originally it was known as Horne’s Creek, in honor of Thomas Horne who ran a sawmill near the mouth of the Brookville Creek. When the mill was taken over by Daniel Butterfoss, it became Butterfoss’s Creek. In 1851 Hiram Deats bought land from Daniel Butterfoss and others and set up a foundry and milling business. He’s probably the one who named the area Brookville. Deats was well-known for his plow, and produced many of them here, along with wood stoves that were very popular. He built himself a handsome house near the foundry, which much later on became the location of Albion Press. Many of the small houses built along Route 29 were homes of the employees of Hiram Deats. There was a store here, although the typical village services were all available just up the road in Centre Bridge (later Stockton). The Deats Manufactory came to a close in the 1880’s, after a huge freshet turned the modest Brookville Creek into a raging torrent that destroyed most of the buildings that Deats had constructed. All that is left are the houses, but Brookville still has an identity.

Croton

Croton, looking west on Old Croton Road

Croton, which is divided between Delaware and Raritan Townships, was called Allerton before the Civil War. There was a sawmill there, located on the Wickecheoke Creek, started in 1811 by Albertus King. It was taken over by John Aller and his mother Amy in 1829. The village was named for them, until 1845 when a post office was located there. The postal service had no more respect for Allerton than it did for Barber’s Station and arbitrarily named the village Croton, after the Croton Reservoir in New York.

It’s hard to believe it today, but in 1931, Croton was described as “a busy hamlet.” If there is little left of Croton today, it’s because much of it has burned down. Probably no other place in the township suffered so much from fire as did Croton. In its early days, it was home to a very wealthy family headed by Elisha Warford who lived from 1785 to 1872. He owned so much real estate, it was said he could walk from Croton to Locktown without leaving his own property. I get the impression that he was a hard dealer in his transactions, and prospered from it. The best that could be said of him was that he never cheated an honest tenant, and he must have had a lot of tenants.

His daughter Mary Ann Ellicott took over the real estate after Warford’s death. Warford’s nephew Holcombe ran a wheelwright shop in Allerton and was the postmaster when the post office was set up in 1845. That was also the year that Dennis Carkhuff established a blacksmith shop. Two years later, Asher Trimmer came into town, bought Carkhuff’s blacksmith shop and set up a tavern. Later, Carkhuff moved to another corner of the village and set up another blacksmith shop.

The first store was established in 1840 by David Rockafellow. There was also a chair factory in the town. In 1861, the Croton Baptist Church (later the Cavanagh Corp., now the Kollmer Equipment Co.) was built out of brick made in a kiln just north of the village. Maybe they started making bricks because so many buildings burned here. The kiln was established by 1832 or earlier. The bricks were also used for the 6th Presbyterian Church of Amwell, which was taken down about 1865.

The sawmill was one of the structures that burned, along with the store and tavern, and the Warford-Ellicott barn, which was full of antiques. Some of the houses were also lost, which explains why empty lots that are filled with trees today seem as if they should have had houses on them.

There were many storekeepers in the village during the 19th century. Keep in mind that Highway 12 did not exist, and the main road from Flemington to Frenchtown went through the old village. Once again, we have a location with an important intersection (with Route 579) and a creek usable for milling and a tavern and a store, followed by a post office and a church, and a schoolhouse. In 1914, Croton had a population of 100, a Baptist church, a public school, telephone, telegraph and express office. The post office closed in 1935.

Croton was definitely a successful village, despite its many fires. And it still has a lot of activity today, with two restaurants, an autobody shop, a small manufacturer and a gas station.

Dilts Corner

Here’s a mysterious location. If you drive to Dilts Corner, you will find an intersection (Lambertville-Headquarters Road and Sandy Ridge-Mt. Airy Road) with houses on the corners. No commercial enterprises of any kind, no church or school. How did it come to exist? The area was named for Robert Dilts who arrived in 1824, but the name was changed to Oakdale when the post office was moved there from Barber’s Station in 1895. It was Oakdale in 1905 when the post office was discontinued and Rural Free Delivery was established. Then the old name reasserted itself.

Robert Dilts was a shoemaker, who turned shoemaking into a serious business, with three employees and several buildings devoted to the work. He sold his business and farm of 50 acres in 1868 and retired to Prallsville. Another settler at Dilts Corner in 1824 was Jacob Godown, who set up a wheelwright and blacksmith business. His son Charles W. Godown took over when his father retired, became a man of consequence and was elected to the state Assembly in 1879. The name Dilts Corner was in use in 1858 when a new road was laid out nearby. The name does not appear on the Atlas of 1873, but a busy place is indicated, with a blacksmith shop, wheelwright shop and six dwellings. But the blacksmith shop went out of business, the wheelwright shop went out of business, and so the village went out of business.

Headquarters

Much has already been said about Headquarters in the 18th century. But what became of it after that? The mill continued to be an active and important industrial/commercial site. It was run by the Conover brothers (John and Elias) for several years until they went bankrupt, and then it was taken over by John and Joseph Carrell, who were very important and successful property owners in that neighborhood. Joseph Carrell ran the mills until he was very old. He and his wife were still living there in 1929, and Charles Jurgensen remembered that his father brought corn to that mill in 1913 to be ground for his cows. But by that time, the creek that powered the mill was so unreliable that Jurgensen took his business to Prallsville.

The store that was located at the mill was discontinued by John Carrell. Another one was started up in a small house facing Route 604. Bert German was the storekeeper there from 1912 on. Nearby, Manuel Green ran a blacksmith and wagon shop where he also built sleighs. Robert Wilson ran a tailor shop also nearby.

The Store at Headquarters, Mr. and Mrs. Bert German

The tavern that had been a meeting place during the Revolution was allowed to deteriorate and eventually was torn down. It had been located on the southwest corner of the intersection. It would make a very interesting archeological site. Perhaps someday we’ll get a grant.

Headquarters didn’t get a post office until 1887, and when it did, it was given the name of Grover (for New Jersey native, President Grover Cleveland). Of course, hardly anyone who lived there called it that. And as soon as Rural Free Delivery was established in 1905 and the post office closed, the place went back to being Headquarters.

The well-being of the village of Headquarters depended almost entirely on the success of the mill. By the 1930’s the mill was no longer in operation, and once the store closed, the village became strictly residential.  (Here is a list of some articles previously published about Headquarters.)

Locktown

Locktown in the 1920s; the small boy is Milt Smith

Can’t see the small boy? Click on the photo.

Locktown is definitely a 19th century village. Although there was a Baptist Church here as early as 1750, there wasn’t much of anything else, even though there were settlers in the area as early as the 1740’s. The first evidence of village activity comes from Daniel Rittenhouse, grandson of the William Rittenhouse who settled in Rosemont. Daniel Rittenhouse was a cooper; he built barrels of all sizes. His farm was located just west of Locktown in Kingwood Township, a property which some may recall as the Shady Lane Inn. Rittenhouse’s property extended all the way to the center of Locktown. In 1805, he leased a small lot for a schoolhouse near the bridge over the Wickecheoke.

Daniel Rittenhouse was also a distiller as well as a cooper, which made sense. The liquid he distilled went into the barrels he built, which he then sold to stores like the one in Prallsville. But, being an enterprising man, he decided to open a tavern to sell more of what he distilled. That tavern was located on the corner of the Kingwood-Locktown Road and the Locktown-Sergeantsville Road (once again we have an intersection of roads that go from here to there). It was known for many years as the Locktown Hotel.

In 1819, Rittenhouse conveyed another lot just north of the tavern to the trustees of the Kingwood Baptist Church, who proceeded to build the building that is still standing today. By 1839, controversy within the congregation led to a division so serious, that one faction locked the other out of the church. The other faction responded with its own lock, and the tavern keeper, one Benjamin Hyde, seeing a great advertising opportunity, had a sign built with three locks. And that is the origin of the name Locktown.

There was discontent in the Locktown congregation before 1839. In 1828, a charismatic preacher arrived named Rev. Abigail Roberts, born in 1791, who preached from 1816 to 1828, the last few years in Hunterdon County and northwestern New Jersey. She was affiliated with the Christian Connection Church. Her message was that “the followers of Christ were Christians and should be known by that name.”1  She preached against the disunity that plagued so many Protestant religions, and yet her message inspired people to separate and create their own Christian churches, like the one at Locktown, established in 1828. The church is still there, although today it is Presbyterian. Like the Old School Baptist Church, the Christian (Presbyterian) church has a cemetery worth visiting, with many of the old Locktown residents interred there.

By 1856 when a post office was established, the place had the name of Locktown, a name that even the postal service could not ignore. The post office was located in the general store which was first run by a nephew of Daniel Rittenhouse. Later on it was for many years run by Joseph Smith, the father of Milt Smith who lives there now. There was also a wheelwright and blacksmith shop in the village and even a military hall. They both burned down in the early 1900’s. The post office closed in 1906, thanks again to rural free delivery.

Toward the end of the 19th century, two developments in agriculture affected the village of Locktown, one was the Grange movement and the other was the development of local creameries. The Locktown Grange under the name “No. 88, Patrons of Husbandry,” was founded in 1875. The first meetings were held in a room at the Locktown Hotel. In 1878 a new Grange Hall was dedicated. Unlike many aspects of 19th century village life, the Locktown Grange has survived to the end of the 20th century by shifting its emphasis from farming concerns to family concerns. It is probably best known for its annual chicken barbecue, but it has many community programs and has been one of the township’s most enduring institutions.

The Creamery was built in 1883, two years after the first one in the whole county was built in Sergeantsville. This resulted from the invention of the cream separator in 1880. The Creamery would convert the milk supplied by local farmers into butter and cheese which was then shipped to Trenton and Philadelphia. The skim milk and whey were sold back to the farmers for hog feed. In 1909 there were about 30 creameries in Hunterdon County. They operated six days a week, from sunrise to late at night. But eventually large processing plants put them out of business. Most of them were closed by 1920. The Rosemont Creamery closed in 1918, the Sergeantsville Creamery a few years later. The Locktown Creamery held out until the 1930’s.

The Locktown store is closed, as is the post office, the hotel, the creamery and the school. The blacksmith and wheelwright are gone. Like other villages, Locktown is primarily residential, except for its churches and the Grange.

Raven Rock and Bull’s Island

I have been writing a series of posts about Raven Rock which give far more detailed history of the place and its residents, beginning with “Raven Rock and the Saxtonville Tavern” and these subsequent articles.

Early road work at Raven Rock

There are some lovely paintings of Raven Rock by artists like Kenneth Nunamaker, which I probably cannot reproduce here. 

The village of Raven Rock was one of those places first used by the Lenape. The legislation that created Amwell Township in 1708 began the boundary at the northern part of Bull’s Island, which the Lenape called Mauanissing, but the term Raven Rock was used as early as 1732 (in the will of John Ladd, who owned part of it). The island was called Bool’s Island for most of the 19th century. Bool was Richard Bull, an early 18th century surveyor who owned part of Bull’s Island for many years, although he never lived there.

There might have been a store here across from the island in 1801 run by Moses Quinby. In 1809, Nathaniel Saxton bought the property, which became known as the Saxtonville Tavern, and the village became Saxtonville, even though the name Raven Rock had been in use for nearly 100 years. On the 1851 map the village appears as “Sextons Ville.” Saxton, in partnership with George Holcombe, also bought 30 acres on Bulls’ Island and adjacent 10 acres with an existing grist and saw mill. They had been run by Mahlon Cooper and Robert Curry since the mid 1790s, but the partners went bankrupt. Until a bridge was built across the Delaware from Raven Rock to Lumberville in 1835, people got across by way of Painter’s Ferry, also known as Rose’s Ferry, MacLean’s Ferry and Johnson’s Ferry. It was in operation at the foot of Federal Twist Road well before the Revolution.

One of the major activities here in Raven Rock was the quarry, which was located just south of the settlement on a farm owned by Anton and Bertha Schuck. It produced sandstone for urban brownstones as well as other projects, and remained in operation well into the 1950s. Small houses were built here by the quarry workers, but I don’t know if any of them have survived.

In 1834, the Delaware & Raritan Canal feeder was constructed, using Bull’s Creek along the eastern side of Bull’s Island as the beginning of the canal feeder. The activity that resulted from the construction work did a lot to establish the village. The canal workers, most of whom were Irish immigrants, could get very thirsty, and the tavern was happy to oblige.

Once the canal was built, the constant use of the canal continued to keep Bull’s Island lively. And then in 1851 the Belvidere and Delaware Railroad went through, repeating in a sense, the chaos that had been experienced with the building of the canal. Many of those who built and ran the railroad lived in the village. When the railroad was finished, a train stop was established at “Bool’s Island,” as well as a post office, and people often took the trip there along the river just for the excursion. There was also a store that was still in business in 1914.

There was a blacksmith shop here, but the blacksmith spent much of his time mending broken rail ties, rather than broken horse shoes. The first post office here was the Saxtonville Post Office which opened in 1832 and closed in 1837. Once the railroad opened, a new post office at “Raven Rock” opened in 1853 and wasn’t discontinued until 1935, although the name was changed back and forth between “Raven Rock” and “Ravenrock.” In 1914, the population here was 175 and it had one rural delivery route and a postmaster, storekeeper George W. Robinson.

Despite all its activity, this village lacked many of the amenities one associates with villages. There was never a school or a church there. It seems likely that residents made use of their easy connection with Lumberville across the river to satisfy their needs for education and religion. I should make an exception to that sweeping statement and take notice of the Christian Science Church on Strimples Mill Road, but that was a 20th century church until about 1951, when it became a residence.

Once the canal and railroad stopped operating, village activity slowed to a crawl. This stately pace was not disturbed by the influx of artists during the early 20th century who found the setting irresistible. But things got a little too lively in the 1950s and 1960s when the “Missing Link,” the stretch of road that is now Highway 29, got paved, and when rumor spread that there was uranium to be found on the old quarry. The road got paved, the rumors proved false, and life returned to normal, more or less. Since Bull’s Island, across from the village, is a state park, there is always plenty of activity there, and Highway 29 is a fast and busy road, not so congenial for a village. Despite all that, the village has lost little of its charm.

Rosemont

Rosemont, looking north from the Lots O' Time shop

Real village activity did not get going here until the 1840’s. The first merchant was Henry Winters who opened a store in 1845. I believe the store location was across from the Rittenhouse tavern, where the Rosemont Café was located. One of the subsequent storekeepers, Samuel Hartpence, was also an undertaker. He’s the only undertaker I know of in Delaware Township in the 19th century. The reason he lived in Rosemont is probably because the Rosemont Cemetery had become a very popular burying place. In 1914, there was still an undertaker here–his name was C. Walter Green.

Rosemont also had a doctor as early as 1841, Dr. John Barcroft. I hope that the success of the cemetery was not a reflection on the good doctor’s abilities. He was followed by several others, and this is a little unusual. Sergeantsville is the only other village that had a doctor living there for most of the 19th century. The most famous of these Rosemont doctors was George N. Best, who was also a national authority on botany. He died in 1926.

Back to the Rosemont store:  a later storekeeper, Willis Carver (as in Carver’s Auto Parts), is said to have had one of the first radios in the area. It was a very exciting technology and people crowded into his store whenever there was a big sporting event, like a boxing championship. Rosemont never got a post office during the pre-Civil War post office frenzy. It came later, in 1884, and was located in the village store, until the store closed in 1944. It was then moved across the street to the sitting room of the postmaster’s house. Aside from Sergeantsville, Rosemont is the only Delaware Township village to still have its post office, but it has been moved out of the sitting room and into the Cane Farm complex.

Rosemont had a shoemaker and two churches, but the school was a few miles west out of the village. A blacksmith shop was opened by J. R. Silverthorne in the building that now contains the Lots O’ Time shop. A wagon maker was also here, along with a harness shop, and a carriage and sleigh factory. There was a hatchery behind the wagon shop, and also a creamery just north of the old Rittenhouse tavern. By 1914 Rosemont had a population of 90. You can see from this how much villages were defined by horses, and how the change from horses to automobiles permanently changed the villages.

As for the name, Clint Wilson wrote an article describing how it happened. On June 4, 1845, Fanny Barcroft, the daughter of Ambrose Barcroft and Anna Woolverton, married Peter Ten Broeck Runk. According to the Barcroft Genealogy, the wedding guests, who must have been enchanted with the location, and perhaps with an abundance of roses, decided the place should thereafter be called Rosemount or Rosemont.

As to the large hatcheries that became the Cane Farm complex, they did not come into existence until the end of the 19th century when, thanks to the railroads, hatcheries became a profitable business. Quite a few people were employed at the hatchery in the early to mid 20th century, right through World War II. It was one of the Township’s biggest employers at the time.

Sand Brook

Sand Brook, looking west towards Rte 523

In a previous article about Sand Brook on the Delaware Township Post, I have written that the village got its 18th century start with Kitchen’s Mill.  The mill was still in operation in 1880 when it was run by Hiram Moore. There was a schoolhouse there as early as 1790. But the big event in this place was the construction of a new church in 1848, by a group of dissatisfied members of the German Baptist Church down the road. They were known as “Moorites,” because they were followers of John A. Moore, who was also the storekeeper in Sand Brook. When a post office was opened ten years later, Moore was named the postmaster. John A. Moore was definitely the man to see in Sand Brook.

Sand Brook had all the proper accouterments of a 19th century village. Besides the mill and the store and the school and the church, there was a blacksmith, a wagonmaker, a wheelwright who specialized in ax handles, and a second store. The original store has since burned down. The post office didn’t close until 1959.

Like other villages, Sand Brook had a good number of houses built close together on small lots. On farms, the houses are frequently located well back from the road. But in villages, even if the lot was large, the house would be built right up front, close to the road. People who owned large acreage in a village area would sell off very small lots with road frontage. Small lots were an essential part of village life. They suited the professionals and retired farmers who lived there. There were also artisans or mechanics, people who earned their livelihood through activities other than farming. A large lot was not much use to them, and their occupations required them to be near a congregation of people. Taverns in the 18th century were usually on large lots so that drovers could leave their animals overnight. But in the 19th century, when taverns were known as hotels and the drovers had faded away, the lots became much smaller.

Sandy Ridge

Sandy Ridge was originally called “Bool’s Corner,” in honor of that very same Richard Bull, whom we have already discussed at Raven Rock. He had done some surveying in the area back in 1711. Sandy Ridge was never a village in the traditional sense. It never had a mill or a tavern or a store or a post office. All it had was a church and a cemetery. And yet it seems as if it has always been considered a place with an identity. Egbert T. Bush called it a community of farmers. Many of the earliest settlers here were Dutch and German, like the Van Dolahs, Butterfosses, Van Voorsts, and Hagamans, people who tended to stick together because, originally, they did not speak English. Also, back in the days when most of the trees had been cleared, you could get an extraordinary view from Sandy Ridge all the way to the Sourland Mountains. This made it a very attractive place. It has an identity, but cannot really be called a village.

 Sergeantsville

So finally we come to Sergeantsville. I could go on at great length about the development of this village, but I think that Clint Wilson best described what the place was like when he wrote about Sergeantsville on a Saturday night, That was when it was at its best, in the 1920’s. His family’s store, the Wilson Store, directly across from the Township Hall, was kept open until midnight on Saturdays because many of the country people came into the village to do their shopping then. They would stop at the store to leave a list, and then head over to the Grange Hall, or to Green’s Barber Shop. This was located next to the post office and there was also a restaurant there. Saturdays were so busy (standing room only) that George Green had to hire an extra barber. And not everyone there had come for a haircut. Some preferred to play pool or dominoes. Others came for the oyster stew that William Cole, who ran the restaurant, was famous for. Still others came for the entertainment; it seems that George Green the barber had a friend named Malloy from Lambertville who would bring some of his talented friends and put on a show of country and western tunes. Sadly, George Green’s Barber Shop and Restaurant burned down some years later.

Sergeantsville, on Rte 604 looking west

I encourage you to click on this photo to get a more detailed look. I did not crop it because that would cut out the person on the left, and the township hall on the right. 

Sergeantsville was such a lively place that it could support two barber shops with related facilities (pool table, restaurant, candy shop, etc.), and the second one was started up by Lewis Higgins. There was a little friendly competition between Higgins and Green. The Higgins shop was located in the building that used to house George Fisher’s Harness Shop, on the southeast corner where John and Joseph Sergeant once had their store. Higgins rented the basement out to William Dobbins, and it was Dobbins who gave children the best reason for coming to Sergeantsville on a Saturday night: Ice Cream.

Several years ago, I took some of the township 3d graders on a walk into Sergeantsville to tell them something of its history. We had a great time, even though it was 95 degrees, and as I was talking about how things developed I realized that ice cream and liquor play an significant role in the history of Sergeantsville. We’ll start with the liquor and the tavern of Agesilaus Gordon. Over the years, many people ran that tavern; the turnover was quite remarkable until Jacob K. Wilson came along. Wilson took on the job of innkeeper in 1872. After awhile, he was given the job of Township Clerk, so he could take the minutes and also serve the beverages. He ran the hotel longer than anyone else. But when Prohibition came along, Wilson went out of business. It took an active campaign to raise the money needed to help the Methodist Church purchase the building from the Wilsons in 1920 and turn it into a Community Center.

And then Prohibition was repealed. Now, the Methodists were not about to apply for a new tavern license. But an enterprising storekeeper named John Blanar saw his opportunity. At that time, he was running an ice cream parlor in today’s Sergeantsville Inn, which he started after William Dobbins went out of business. Blanar figured he could do a lot better selling drinks than he could selling ice cream, so he changed his business. This left the children of Sergeantsville (and more than a few adults) bereft of ice cream. So, Israel Poulson Shepherd came to the rescue and opened an ice cream shop in his store on the northeast corner. Sergeantsville is the only Delaware Township village to offer both ice cream and alcohol ever since the middle of the 19th century.

The Decline of the Villages

(Note: As I revised this conclusion to the subject of Delaware Township villages, I realized how much I was influenced by the years I spent on the Township Planning Board, gaining an understanding of how people found places to live, how land got divided, even how business activity waxed and waned. It’s a process that never ends.)

One might argue that in the 18th century, the necessary requirements for a village were an important intersection of roads, or a ferry for riverside locations, along with a mill, a church, a tavern or a store. In the 19th century and the first half of the 20th, the makings of a village would be a hotel, a store and post office, blacksmith shop and wheelwright, plus a barber shop, ice cream shop, restaurant, grange, creamery and military or mechanics hall where pool was played and groups like the Vigilante Society would hold their meetings and enact their rituals.

After World War II, when new suburbs were opened up and new highways built, villages lost their usefulness. Clint Wilson prefaced that article about Sergeantsville on a Saturday night by saying that in his own time, Sergeantsville was dead by 8 o’clock in the evening. One Saturday night he found only two cars parked on the main street, not a person in sight. Today, the village is more active. There is more traffic, more stores, the post office is always busy, and there always seems to be a meeting at the township hall or an event at the firehouse. But today’s activity cannot compare with Sergeantsville in its heyday.

The biggest change to the riverside villages before the automobile came along was  construction of the bridges, between 1814 and 1835. The loss of the ferries had an impact, but the canal and the railroad brought new business to compensate.

Mills located in villages, like Sand Brook, Prallsville, and Headquarters did not shut down until the late 19th or early 20th century. They became unreliable as water flow decreased and became more seasonal. Farmers changed from growing subsistence crops to commercial crops, which did not require local mills. Farm families could buy their flour in a store, so why take grain to a mill? Mills had other uses, like grinding field corn for livestock, making plaster, hulling clover seed, etc. But technology gradually outpaced the mills. Stores, post offices and hotels became the principle village attractions.

There were two other forces that helped to close down the villages by the mid 20th century: one was Prohibition and the other was Rural Free Delivery. Prohibition closed down all the taverns, and rural free delivery eliminated many of the local post offices. Then the small stores began to close as larger ones opened in more central locations. In the 1930s, the canal was shut down, and eventually the railroad did too. The creameries closed, the Granges became less active, the pool halls and restaurants went out of business. There was no longer much reason for people to go to the villages. They only served their own residents, and those were not numerous enough to justify active businesses, especially during the tough days of the Depression.

I’ve said that horses helped to create villages and cars helped to destroy them. It’s interesting to note that gasoline stations have had little to do with village history here in Delaware Township. In the years before World War II, many of the general stores had gas pumps in front. Those gradually disappeared as larger gas stations were built on the highways. There was an auto repair place in Sergeantsville not all that long ago, called Quick’s Garage (now the tile store), and there is a gas station on Route 12, but for the most part, people drive away from Delaware to get their gasoline and their cars repaired, whereas in the 19th century, they came to the villages to get what they needed for their horses and wagons.

Originally, villages served the needs of people who lived outside them more than they did the immediate residents, just as 18th century taverns began by serving travelers more than local people. Once the country folk began going to Flemington and Lambertville for their needs, rather than to the villages, the only reason for villages to continue was to serve the people still living there and that is more or less the case today. But Sergeantsville, Croton, Locktown (for its churches) and Rosemont have many attractions that continue to bring visitors. It’s a delicate balance between local needs and visitors’ needs that can make all the difference for a village.

The remaining villages of Delaware Township are echoes of what they once were. But if you stop to listen to those echoes, you can come closer to the way things used to be, and that helps to understand how they are now.

Final Note: If any residents of these villages take umbrage with my characterization of their neighborhoods, I hope they will express their feelings here. These villages have changed a lot, but they have not disappeared. I have described their decline in the 20th century, but not what they are like today. They are still active places; they matter to the people who live there now as much as to those whose families lived there long ago.

Corrections

4/29/2012: A descendant of Elisha Warford informed me that Holcombe Warford was not a son of Elisha’s, as I had first written, but rather his nephew, the son of Elijah Warford and his wife Amy Holcombe.

  1. “Abigail Roberts—Pioneering Spirit” by Shirley Wydner published in the Hunterdon Historical Newsletter, vol. 34, no. 3, pg 805. see also this portrait.

{ 2 comments }

Saxton’s Saxtonville

by Marfy Goodspeed on March 14, 2012

in Delaware Township

Recap

In March and May, 1808, Nathaniel Saxton and George Holcombe bought the two moieties or half shares in the 10-acre mill lot and the 30-acre lot that consisted of the southern half of Bull’s Island. Previous articles about the mill property can be read here and here.

In 1809, Nathaniel Saxton was in business, running the mill, making deliveries to his agent Albertus King in Philadelphia, and persuading his brother Ananais to come from Shamokin, Pennsylvania to help run the mill. He had also settled with Moses Quinby on acquisition of the 15+acre lot where Quinby was living, which today is known as the Saxtonville Tavern. I don’t believe Saxton actually moved into Quinby’s house on that lot. Quinby had probably used it as a home and store. The Quinby Genealogy states that Moses Quinby had attempted store-keeping after he sold off his farmland, so that may have been the use to which the house was put, with the family living in part of it, and the store in another part. I had hoped to find some evidence in the Saxton papers on file at the Hunterdon County Historical Society that Saxton converted the store to a tavern, but so far there is no such smoking gun. It seems clear that Saxton himself maintained his residence in Flemington, where he was pursuing his legal practice in partnership with George C. Maxwell.

Even so, Saxton’s interest in the Raven Rock neighborhood grew stronger, and he turned his eye to the remainder of Moses Quinby’s land, the 40+ acres he had sold to Robert Nailor.

Raven Rock Land Transactions

On July 20, 1810, Saxton purchased 37.25 acres from Robert Naylor, for $1500.1 This was actually a sort of land swap, since Saxton sold to Naylor at the same time a lot of 38 acres on Strimples Mill Road, which Saxton had acquired from the estate of Isaac Van Camp dec’d in June 1810.2 But Naylor only paid $700 for his lot. Perhaps it was actually worth less than the Raven Rock lot, but it might have been simply Saxton’s eagerness to acquire properties in Raven Rock that led him to take a loss. Perhaps to help finance these purchases, Saxton sold a lot of 3.1 acres out of the Naylor lot to Joseph Rodman on July 21, 1810.3.

This 37.25 acres ran from today’s Quarry Road northwest to encompass the farm that later on was owned by George & Edna Lazlo.

Nathaniel Saxton was not entirely invested in Raven Rock. He had some other irons in the fire. For instance, in 1808 he bought from the executors of Stephen Yard deceased a farm located on “the road from Flemington to New Brunswick” on the northeast side of Amwell Township. From 1808 to 1811, Saxton managed to sell off four parcels out of the original 87.5 acres, to Thomas Williams, Cornelius Wyckoff, James Clark Jr. and George Rea.

He also invested in a couple lots in Flemington close to the court house, which he sold to Neal Hart, also in 1811. But back in Raven Rock, Saxton was eyeing the small lots created by Jacob Hunt, who had bought the 19+ acres sold to Benjamin Longstreath in 1806, and had sold off lots to Jonas Lake (3+ acres),4  Andrew Price (1.13 acres) and James Snyder (13.84 acres). Nathaniel Saxton bought the lot sold to Andrew Price in 1810 for $150. He also bought a lot from Joseph Rodman that year, over the township line in Kingwood.

On December 29, 1812, with the War of that year just warming up, Nathaniel Saxton finally acquired the remainder of Bull’s Island. The 60+ acre island had been divided in half, with the southern half being connected with Cooper & Curry’s mill, now owned by Saxton & Holcombe. The northern half had remained with George Wall, but after Wall’s death it had come into possession of the Townsend brothers, Joseph and Jonathan, of Solebury, Pennsylvania. They sold the upper half of the island to Saxton for $1750, or about $58 per acre.5  Once again, Saxton was paying top dollar for his real estate. This deed excepted out the right of the heirs of George Wall Esq. to have access the river side of the island so that they could continue to maintain the Prime Hope or Snap Jaw fishery, which was located at the northern end of the island.

When Did Raven Rock Become Saxtonville?

I have searched available records looking for the first mention of Saxtonville, and the best I can do (so far) is a deed dated July 1, 1814, when Nathaniel Saxton sold his moiety or half share in the mill lot of 10 acres to George Holcombe, owner of the other half.6 This made Holcombe sole owner of the mill lot. Despite that, it was “Saxtonville” from then on, not Holcombeville. The name Saxtonville was used in deeds that Saxton was concerned in until Saxton had sold his last lot in the village in the 1830s.

Addendum, 3/31/12:  A mortgage given by Mindert Wilson Jr. to George Holcombe for purchase of the mill lot described the ”lot or parcel of Land whereon the said Mindert Wilson now dwells situate at Saxton Ville in the Township of Amwell.” It was dated July 3, 1814.

Here is another interesting early reference to Saxtonville: an 1818 road petition for Strimples Mill Road with reference to “the stone bridge over the race above John B. Hamilton’s Grist Mill at Saxton Vill.”7

I don’t think the village was named after Saxton by its appreciative residents (there were hardly any), but rather by Saxton himself, to help call attention to the place. After all, until George Wall bought the 75 acres and the island from Isaiah Quinby in 1801, there was very little happening here other than the fishery and the mill. But with the growth of the economy in the early 19th century, the area became attractive, and Nathaniel Saxton was one of the first to appreciate that fact.

 

  1. Deed 017-155
  2. Deed 017-135
  3. Deed 23-420 ½
  4. Jonas Lake might have been Jacob Hunt’s son-in-law, husband of his daughter Sarah, but I’m not sure. Jacob Hunt and his wife Elizabeth Phillips both died in the early 1840s and are buried in the Sandy Ridge Cemetery. Unfortunately, they didn’t live long enough to be counted in the 1850 census.
  5. Deed 20-342
  6. Deed 23-124
  7. Road Petition of 1818 for Strimples Mill, Hunterdon Co. Road Book 2 pg 197

{ 0 comments }